Nationwide survey of importance-performance analysis on infection control and prevention practices at the tertiary hospitals in South Korea

Objectives: This study was conducted to define the classification of the infection control and prevention (IPC) practices through task analysis method, and to perform importance-performance analysis (IPA) on IPC tasks, consequently providing operational guidelines for the department of IPC. Methods: To define the tasks of the IPC practices, the draft was developed through the legal and literature reviews, and the final IPC tasks were confirmed by content validity test. The IPC tasks were assessed by IPA method. The national surveys were conducted by the institutional and individual level from October to November, 2023. The institutional questionnaire was distributed nationally to the IPC director/manager of the tertiary hospitals, and IPC practitioners assessed the IPA of IPC task. Results: Two thirds (30/45) of the IPC director/manager responded the institutional questionnaire. A total of 135 IPC practitioners (32 physicians and 103 nurses) completed the IPA survey. The average beds of hospitals participated in this study were 1,060±436. The ICP staffing met the legal requirements in all hospitals. The IPC tasks were consisted of 11 categories and 38 items including surveillance and ICP planning. According to IPA, at a 1 st quadrant (high in frequency and importance) surveillance, infectious patient management, health management and action planning of healthcare associated infection were placed. At a 2 nd quadrant (high in importance but low in frequency), annual IPC planning was positioned. At a third quadrant (low in frequency and importance), ICP training, policy-making, general hygiene, and ICP staffing were placed. There was nothing at a 4 th quadrant (high in frequency but low in importance). Conclusion: Most of IPC tasks are consistent in degree of importance and frequency except IPC planning. Based on IPA, priority-based task distribution should be considered to maximize the work efficacy and effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.124
Primary Topic
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nationwide survey of importance-performance analysis on infection control and prevention practices at the tertiary hospitals in South Korea

Jae Geum Ryu, Jae Sim Jeong, Hye Ran Choi, Y Woo
Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
article

Nationwide survey of importance-performance analysis on infection control and prevention practices at the tertiary hospitals in South Korea

Jae Geum Ryu, Jae Sim Jeong, Hye Ran Choi, Y Woo
article en

Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted to define the classification of the infection control and prevention (IPC) practices through task analysis method, and to perform importance-performance analysis (IPA) on IPC tasks, consequently providing operational guidelines for the department of IPC. Methods: To define the tasks of the IPC practices, the draft was developed through the legal and literature reviews, and the final IPC tasks were confirmed by content validity test. The IPC tasks were assessed by IPA method. The national surveys were conducted by the institutional and individual level from October to November, 2023. The institutional questionnaire was distributed nationally to the IPC director/manager of the tertiary hospitals, and IPC practitioners assessed the IPA of IPC task. Results: Two thirds (30/45) of the IPC director/manager responded the institutional questionnaire. A total of 135 IPC practitioners (32 physicians and 103 nurses) completed the IPA survey. The average beds of hospitals participated in this study were 1,060±436. The ICP staffing met the legal requirements in all hospitals. The IPC tasks were consisted of 11 categories and 38 items including surveillance and ICP planning. According to IPA, at a 1 st quadrant (high in frequency and importance) surveillance, infectious patient management, health management and action planning of healthcare associated infection were placed. At a 2 nd quadrant (high in importance but low in frequency), annual IPC planning was positioned. At a third quadrant (low in frequency and importance), ICP training, policy-making, general hygiene, and ICP staffing were placed. There was nothing at a 4 th quadrant (high in frequency but low in importance). Conclusion: Most of IPC tasks are consistent in degree of importance and frequency except IPC planning. Based on IPA, priority-based task distribution should be considered to maximize the work efficacy and effectiveness.

Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare EpidemiologyVol. 5(S1)
Ulsan University Hospital (KR), Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KR), Dong-A University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.