Effectiveness of buttress wall in reducing wall deflection for deep excavation supported by tied-back retaining wall systems

This study evaluates the effectiveness of buttress walls (BWs) in reducing wall deflection and ground anchor force in deep excavations supported by tied-back retaining systems. A three-dimensional finite element model (3D FEM) was employed for the study. First, a well-documented excavation project located in Vietnam that adopted BW in combination with ground anchors was first back-analyzed to validate the numerical model. The results showed good agreement between computed wall deflections and field measurements across all excavation stages. In the Vietnam case study, the BW was temporary and was demolished after the final excavation stage. The ground anchors installed were to limit the wall deflection during BW demolition. Parametric studies were then conducted to assess two BW configurations: inner BW (I-BW), placed within the excavation area (Vietnam case), and outer BW (O-BW), located behind the retaining wall. The two configurations were analyzed with and without ground anchors. In addition, one run with only ground anchors was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of BW vs. ground anchors. Results show that both BW configurations reduced wall deflections and anchor forces, with O-BW performing slightly better in the absence of ground anchors due to additional frictional resistance between the BW and the retained soil throughout excavation stages. When ground anchors are used, the difference in performance between I-BW and O-BW becomes negligible due to increased system stiffness. For wall retained by ground anchors only, the deflection of wall is flexible, whilst wall retained by BW only shows rigid behaviour. The maximum deflection, however, is of similar magnitude when the wall is retained by O-BW only and ground anchors only. The deflection is slightly larger when retained by I-BW only. The findings highlight the potential of combining BWs with anchors to increase the rigidity of structural system and enhance excavation safety, particularly under complex soil conditions

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Geotechnical Journal
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56144/igj.v4i2.120
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of buttress wall in reducing wall deflection for deep excavation supported by tied-back retaining wall systems

Ari Surya Abdi, Muhammad Dwiyanto Agung Prakasa
Indonesian Geotechnical Journal
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
article

Effectiveness of buttress wall in reducing wall deflection for deep excavation supported by tied-back retaining wall systems

Ari Surya Abdi, Muhammad Dwiyanto Agung Prakasa
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of buttress walls (BWs) in reducing wall deflection and ground anchor force in deep excavations supported by tied-back retaining systems. A three-dimensional finite element model (3D FEM) was employed for the study. First, a well-documented excavation project located in Vietnam that adopted BW in combination with ground anchors was first back-analyzed to validate the numerical model. The results showed good agreement between computed wall deflections and field measurements across all excavation stages. In the Vietnam case study, the BW was temporary and was demolished after the final excavation stage. The ground anchors installed were to limit the wall deflection during BW demolition. Parametric studies were then conducted to assess two BW configurations: inner BW (I-BW), placed within the excavation area (Vietnam case), and outer BW (O-BW), located behind the retaining wall. The two configurations were analyzed with and without ground anchors. In addition, one run with only ground anchors was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of BW vs. ground anchors. Results show that both BW configurations reduced wall deflections and anchor forces, with O-BW performing slightly better in the absence of ground anchors due to additional frictional resistance between the BW and the retained soil throughout excavation stages. When ground anchors are used, the difference in performance between I-BW and O-BW becomes negligible due to increased system stiffness. For wall retained by ground anchors only, the deflection of wall is flexible, whilst wall retained by BW only shows rigid behaviour. The maximum deflection, however, is of similar magnitude when the wall is retained by O-BW only and ground anchors only. The deflection is slightly larger when retained by I-BW only. The findings highlight the potential of combining BWs with anchors to increase the rigidity of structural system and enhance excavation safety, particularly under complex soil conditions

Indonesian Geotechnical JournalVol. 4(2)
National Taiwan University (TW), Politeknik Negeri Ujung Pandang
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.