A Comparative Evaluation of CNN and Transfer Learning Models for Multi-Class Skin Disease Classification

The automated classification of skin diseases has the potential to significantly enhance patient outcomes through early and targeted treatment. In this study, we compared a custom convolutional neural network (CNN) with three transfer learning architectures—ResNet50, DenseNet201, and Inception—for classifying nine different dermatological conditions. The models were trained on the publicly available FYP Skin Disease Dataset, which consists of 4500 images of both prevalent and serious skin diseases including melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma. We conducted extensive performance analysis using accuracy, loss curves, confusion matrices, and multi-class ROC analysis. Our findings indicate that the custom CNN achieved 100% validation accuracy, followed by DenseNet201 at 99% and Inception at 98%, with ResNet50 lagging at 44%. These results highlight the potential of both custom architectures and transfer learning models in dermatological image analysis, which have significant implications for researchers and clinicians seeking viable automated solutions for skin disease diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025107052
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Evaluation of CNN and Transfer Learning Models for Multi-Class Skin Disease Classification

Ivana Lucia Kharisma, Donny Maulana, Kamdan Kamdan, M. Rizky et al.
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

A Comparative Evaluation of CNN and Transfer Learning Models for Multi-Class Skin Disease Classification

Ivana Lucia Kharisma, Donny Maulana, Kamdan Kamdan, M. Rizky, Rifki Arief Munandar
article en

Abstract

The automated classification of skin diseases has the potential to significantly enhance patient outcomes through early and targeted treatment. In this study, we compared a custom convolutional neural network (CNN) with three transfer learning architectures—ResNet50, DenseNet201, and Inception—for classifying nine different dermatological conditions. The models were trained on the publicly available FYP Skin Disease Dataset, which consists of 4500 images of both prevalent and serious skin diseases including melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma. We conducted extensive performance analysis using accuracy, loss curves, confusion matrices, and multi-class ROC analysis. Our findings indicate that the custom CNN achieved 100% validation accuracy, followed by DenseNet201 at 99% and Inception at 98%, with ResNet50 lagging at 44%. These results highlight the potential of both custom architectures and transfer learning models in dermatological image analysis, which have significant implications for researchers and clinicians seeking viable automated solutions for skin disease diagnosis.

Universitas Wijaya Putra (ID), Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.