Evaluating Methods for Efficient Entity Count Estimation

The problem of estimating the size of a query result has a long history in data management. When the query performs entity resolution (aka record linkage or deduplication), the problem is that of estimating the number of distinct entities, referred to as the entity count. This problem has received attention from the statistics community but it has been largely overlooked in the data management literature. In this work, we formally define the entity count problem from a data management perspective and decompose it into a framework of fundamental steps. We explore approaches from both statistics and data management, systematically identifying a design space for different pipelines that address this problem. Finally, we provide extensive experiments to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches on real-world benchmarks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14778/3742728.3742750
Primary Topic
Data Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Methods for Efficient Entity Count Estimation

Jerin George Mathew, Donatella Firmani, Divesh Srivastava
Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
Data Quality and Management
article

Evaluating Methods for Efficient Entity Count Estimation

Jerin George Mathew, Donatella Firmani, Divesh Srivastava
article en

Abstract

The problem of estimating the size of a query result has a long history in data management. When the query performs entity resolution (aka record linkage or deduplication), the problem is that of estimating the number of distinct entities, referred to as the entity count. This problem has received attention from the statistics community but it has been largely overlooked in the data management literature. In this work, we formally define the entity count problem from a data management perspective and decompose it into a framework of fundamental steps. We explore approaches from both statistics and data management, systematically identifying a design space for different pipelines that address this problem. Finally, we provide extensive experiments to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches on real-world benchmarks.

Proceedings of the VLDB EndowmentVol. 18(8)
AT&T (United States) (US), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Data Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.