Public Opinion Negotiations in a Digital Media Ecosystem: A Conceptual Framework

Abstract Digital media constitute a key space for the negotiation of public opinion. Despite long-standing research on public opinion climates on digital media, little theory exists that considers their emergence and discursive dynamics. In this article, we conceptualize public opinion negotiations in a digital media ecosystem as a discursive process aimed at delimiting the latitude of normatively acceptable opinions. Building upon theoretical work on predigital media, we distill five enduring aspects to characterize digitally mediated public opinion negotiations as (a) the public expression of (b) normative opinions upon public issues by (c) positioned speakers, resulting in (d) the public negotiation of acceptable stances (e) within digitally mediated public arenas governed by institutional and sociotechnical media logics. Discussing how digital media shape this discursive process, we propose a theory of public opinion negotiations in a digital media ecosystem, flagging operational implications for the empirical study of public opinion processes on digital media.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Public Opinion Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaf049
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Opinion Negotiations in a Digital Media Ecosystem: A Conceptual Framework

Neta Kligler-Vilenchik, Auksė Balčytienė, Christian Baden, Susana Salgado et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Public Opinion Research
Social Media and Politics
3.86
article

Public Opinion Negotiations in a Digital Media Ecosystem: A Conceptual Framework

Neta Kligler-Vilenchik, Auksė Balčytienė, Christian Baden, Susana Salgado, Artur Lipiński, Anna Bączkowska, Aleksandra Krstić, Asta Zelenkauskaitė, Nina Springer, Marc Jungblut
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Digital media constitute a key space for the negotiation of public opinion. Despite long-standing research on public opinion climates on digital media, little theory exists that considers their emergence and discursive dynamics. In this article, we conceptualize public opinion negotiations in a digital media ecosystem as a discursive process aimed at delimiting the latitude of normatively acceptable opinions. Building upon theoretical work on predigital media, we distill five enduring aspects to characterize digitally mediated public opinion negotiations as (a) the public expression of (b) normative opinions upon public issues by (c) positioned speakers, resulting in (d) the public negotiation of acceptable stances (e) within digitally mediated public arenas governed by institutional and sociotechnical media logics. Discussing how digital media shape this discursive process, we propose a theory of public opinion negotiations in a digital media ecosystem, flagging operational implications for the empirical study of public opinion processes on digital media.

International Journal of Public Opinion ResearchVol. 37(3)
University of Lisbon (PT), Vytautas Magnus University (LT), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), University of Münster (DE), LMU Klinikum (DE), University of Gdańsk (PL), University of Belgrade (RS), Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT), Institute of Social Sciences (RU), Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL), FH Münster University of Applied Sciences (DE), Drexel University (US), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
European Cooperation in Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Social Media and Politics
3.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.