The interpersonal process model of intimacy: An experimental investigation of the role of depression in forming connections

Introduction: Depression has a significant impact on a person's interpersonal relationships. Individuals experiencing symptoms of depression report fewer close relationships and meaningful interactions. One model for understanding the development of close relationships is the Interpersonal Process Model of Intimacy (IPM). The IPM suggests that closeness develops when one member of a dyad engages in a vulnerable self-disclosure, and the other member responds to that disclosure in a way that is viewed as responsive. Little is known about how depression impacts the process of engaging in the IPM. Methods: One hundred twenty undergraduate participants were randomly assigned to a 45-minute semistructured small talk condition or a semi-structured condition that called for personal disclosure. During each condition, the participant answered questions with a trained research assistant. Before the experimental task and every 15 minutes, participants completed self-report scales assessing feelings of connection, vulnerable self-disclosure, and provided responsiveness. Results: Findings suggested that individuals reporting higher levels of depression experienced less connection over time than non-depressed individuals, based on condition. A similar pattern emerged in self-reported responses to the research assistant. Discussion: Based on these findings, it is indicated that depression impacts feelings of connection and effective responding but that the impact of depression on willingness to engage in vulnerable disclosure is multiply controlled, and further research is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2025.44.4.316
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The interpersonal process model of intimacy: An experimental investigation of the role of depression in forming connections

Eric M. Cooke, Daniel W. M. Maitland, Cambria L. Davis
Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

The interpersonal process model of intimacy: An experimental investigation of the role of depression in forming connections

Eric M. Cooke, Daniel W. M. Maitland, Cambria L. Davis
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Depression has a significant impact on a person's interpersonal relationships. Individuals experiencing symptoms of depression report fewer close relationships and meaningful interactions. One model for understanding the development of close relationships is the Interpersonal Process Model of Intimacy (IPM). The IPM suggests that closeness develops when one member of a dyad engages in a vulnerable self-disclosure, and the other member responds to that disclosure in a way that is viewed as responsive. Little is known about how depression impacts the process of engaging in the IPM. Methods: One hundred twenty undergraduate participants were randomly assigned to a 45-minute semistructured small talk condition or a semi-structured condition that called for personal disclosure. During each condition, the participant answered questions with a trained research assistant. Before the experimental task and every 15 minutes, participants completed self-report scales assessing feelings of connection, vulnerable self-disclosure, and provided responsiveness. Results: Findings suggested that individuals reporting higher levels of depression experienced less connection over time than non-depressed individuals, based on condition. A similar pattern emerged in self-reported responses to the research assistant. Discussion: Based on these findings, it is indicated that depression impacts feelings of connection and effective responding but that the impact of depression on willingness to engage in vulnerable disclosure is multiply controlled, and further research is needed.

Journal of Social and Clinical PsychologyVol. 44(4)
Bowling Green State University (US), Morehead State University (US), Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.