Jarkesy and the problem of the separation of powers in the U.S.A.

This article discusses the significance of the US Supreme Court ruling of June 27, 2024 in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy. The literature highlights the various implications of this ruling in the context of the role that US administrative agencies play in the system of public authority. Jarkesy does not provide a clear answer to the doubts surrounding the adjudicating function of agencies, nor does it determine the status of administrative law judges, but it does indicate the direction the Supreme Court may take in the near future. Undoubtedly, this direction is aimed at reducing the powers of agencies, which seemed obvious given the rapidly growing importance of these entities at the expense not so much of the judiciary itself as of the principle of due process of law. For these reasons, it is worth presenting the complexity of the issue raised in Jarkesy from the perspective of a lawyer outside the common law system in the ongoing discussion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Public Administration Management and Economic Development
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60026/ijpamed.v10i1.239
Primary Topic
American Constitutional Law and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jarkesy and the problem of the separation of powers in the U.S.A.

Katarzyna Maćkowska
International Journal of Public Administration Management and Economic Development
American Constitutional Law and Politics
article

Jarkesy and the problem of the separation of powers in the U.S.A.

Katarzyna Maćkowska
article en

Abstract

This article discusses the significance of the US Supreme Court ruling of June 27, 2024 in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy. The literature highlights the various implications of this ruling in the context of the role that US administrative agencies play in the system of public authority. Jarkesy does not provide a clear answer to the doubts surrounding the adjudicating function of agencies, nor does it determine the status of administrative law judges, but it does indicate the direction the Supreme Court may take in the near future. Undoubtedly, this direction is aimed at reducing the powers of agencies, which seemed obvious given the rapidly growing importance of these entities at the expense not so much of the judiciary itself as of the principle of due process of law. For these reasons, it is worth presenting the complexity of the issue raised in Jarkesy from the perspective of a lawyer outside the common law system in the ongoing discussion.

International Journal of Public Administration Management and Economic DevelopmentVol. 10(1)
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
American Constitutional Law and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Jarkesy and the problem of the separation of powers in the U.S.A. — Katarzyna Maćkowska · International Journal of Public Administration Management and Economic Development (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS