The impact of pretreatment drug resistance on ainuovirine‐based antiviral therapy in HIV‐infected patients: A subgroup analysis from the RACER study

34 Background: Pre-treatment drug resistance (PDR), particularly to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), presents a significant therapeutic challenge in antiretroviral treatment (ART). This study aims to evaluate the virological response to ainuovirine (ANV)-based antiviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients with NNRTI-PDR. Materials and methods: We conducted a PDR analysis in two cohorts of the RACER study, a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, positive parallel group, Phase 3 trial conducted in nine sites across China. The entire pol and IN genes were amplified and sequenced using HIV genotypic resistance testing. PDR was defined as detection of any mutation (potentially, low, intermediate or high resistant) by oligonucleotide ligation assay when confirmed by Sanger sequencing. All patients were followed up for 48 weeks to observe the virological outcomes of ART. The virological suppression was defined as plasma HIV-RNA < 50 copies/mL at week 48 of ART. Results: A total of 630 subjects were finally enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to either ANV (n = 315) or Efavirenz (EFV, n = 315) groups in the RACER study. Among the 593 included study participants, PDR was detected in 12.5% (n = 74). Of these, 69 (11.6%) were resistant to NNRTIs and 5 (0.84%) were resistant to NRTIs. The virological suppression rates of the PDR-negative group and the ANV group with NNRTI-PDR were 88.1% (37 of 42) and 88.8% (239 of 269) respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the EFV group with NNRTI-PDR (74.1%, 20 of 27). Conclusion: ANV exhibits significantly better antiviral activity compared to EFV, and the prevalence of PDR negatively impacts the outcomes of ANV-based ART. Considering the additional safety advantages of ANV over EFV, ANV is recommended for patients with NNRTI-PDR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70239
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of pretreatment drug resistance on ainuovirine‐based antiviral therapy in HIV‐infected patients: A subgroup analysis from the RACER study

Yi Tang, Ge Gao, Feng Yu, Qun Li et al.
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
article

The impact of pretreatment drug resistance on ainuovirine‐based antiviral therapy in HIV‐infected patients: A subgroup analysis from the RACER study

Yi Tang, Ge Gao, Feng Yu, Qun Li, Xiao Jiang, Xin Yun, Hong Qin, Shu Yang, Zhenhua Jiang
article en

Abstract

34 Background: Pre-treatment drug resistance (PDR), particularly to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), presents a significant therapeutic challenge in antiretroviral treatment (ART). This study aims to evaluate the virological response to ainuovirine (ANV)-based antiviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients with NNRTI-PDR. Materials and methods: We conducted a PDR analysis in two cohorts of the RACER study, a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, positive parallel group, Phase 3 trial conducted in nine sites across China. The entire pol and IN genes were amplified and sequenced using HIV genotypic resistance testing. PDR was defined as detection of any mutation (potentially, low, intermediate or high resistant) by oligonucleotide ligation assay when confirmed by Sanger sequencing. All patients were followed up for 48 weeks to observe the virological outcomes of ART. The virological suppression was defined as plasma HIV-RNA < 50 copies/mL at week 48 of ART. Results: A total of 630 subjects were finally enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to either ANV (n = 315) or Efavirenz (EFV, n = 315) groups in the RACER study. Among the 593 included study participants, PDR was detected in 12.5% (n = 74). Of these, 69 (11.6%) were resistant to NNRTIs and 5 (0.84%) were resistant to NRTIs. The virological suppression rates of the PDR-negative group and the ANV group with NNRTI-PDR were 88.1% (37 of 42) and 88.8% (239 of 269) respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the EFV group with NNRTI-PDR (74.1%, 20 of 27). Conclusion: ANV exhibits significantly better antiviral activity compared to EFV, and the prevalence of PDR negatively impacts the outcomes of ANV-based ART. Considering the additional safety advantages of ANV over EFV, ANV is recommended for patients with NNRTI-PDR.

British Journal of Clinical PharmacologyVol. 91(S1)
Capital Medical University (CN), Yangtze River Pharmaceutical Group (China) (CN), Beijing Ditan Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.