Impact of non-nutritive sweeteners on bacterial quorum sensing and phenotypic expression: implications for gut microbiome dynamics

Non-nutritive sweeteners (NNSs) are popular sugar substitutes, valued for their potential to reduce caloric intake and associated health risks. However, their long-term effects on the human gut microbiome remain debatable. This study investigates the impact of tagatose, allulose, Rebaudioside-A (Reb-A), and saccharin on quorum-sensing (QS)-regulated phenotypes and gene expression in QS biosensor model bacteria. It sheds light on their potential influence on the gut microbiome. Our study revealed diverse effects among the NNSs. Tagatose and allulose demonstrated QS phenotypic inhibition in <i>Chromobacterium violaceum</i> (≈50%) and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (20-50%) in a concentration-dependent manner. Additionally, tagatose and allulose decreased the <i>P. aeruginosa lasI</i> gene expression. Reb-A and saccharin presented a significant, however less prominent, phenotypic inhibition on <i>C. violaceum</i> (25-30%) and <i>P. aeruginosa</i> swarming motility (≈20%). Both NNSs decreased the expression of the <i>lasI</i> gene of <i>P. aeruginosa.</i> Molecular docking of QS regulatory proteins showed that saccharin and Reb-A have significantly higher binding affinity compared to allulose and tagatose, relative to native inducers. These results suggest the complex interactions mediated by NNSs in QS regulatory pathways. These findings provide valuable insights into the varied, species and dose-dependent effects of NNS on microbial communication, suggesting potential implications for the gut microbiome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gut Microbiome
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/gmb.2025.10006
Primary Topic
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of non-nutritive sweeteners on bacterial quorum sensing and phenotypic expression: implications for gut microbiome dynamics

Uelinton Manoel Pinto, Beatriz Ximena Valencia Quecán, Christian Hoffmann, Emília Maria França Lima et al.
Gut Microbiome
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
article

Impact of non-nutritive sweeteners on bacterial quorum sensing and phenotypic expression: implications for gut microbiome dynamics

Uelinton Manoel Pinto, Beatriz Ximena Valencia Quecán, Christian Hoffmann, Emília Maria França Lima, Daniel Granato, M. P. Sherry, Achim Schmalenberger, Mindani I. Watawana, Fabiana Andréa Hoffmann Sardá
article en

Abstract

Non-nutritive sweeteners (NNSs) are popular sugar substitutes, valued for their potential to reduce caloric intake and associated health risks. However, their long-term effects on the human gut microbiome remain debatable. This study investigates the impact of tagatose, allulose, Rebaudioside-A (Reb-A), and saccharin on quorum-sensing (QS)-regulated phenotypes and gene expression in QS biosensor model bacteria. It sheds light on their potential influence on the gut microbiome. Our study revealed diverse effects among the NNSs. Tagatose and allulose demonstrated QS phenotypic inhibition in <i>Chromobacterium violaceum</i> (≈50%) and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (20-50%) in a concentration-dependent manner. Additionally, tagatose and allulose decreased the <i>P. aeruginosa lasI</i> gene expression. Reb-A and saccharin presented a significant, however less prominent, phenotypic inhibition on <i>C. violaceum</i> (25-30%) and <i>P. aeruginosa</i> swarming motility (≈20%). Both NNSs decreased the expression of the <i>lasI</i> gene of <i>P. aeruginosa.</i> Molecular docking of QS regulatory proteins showed that saccharin and Reb-A have significantly higher binding affinity compared to allulose and tagatose, relative to native inducers. These results suggest the complex interactions mediated by NNSs in QS regulatory pathways. These findings provide valuable insights into the varied, species and dose-dependent effects of NNS on microbial communication, suggesting potential implications for the gut microbiome.

Gut MicrobiomeVol. 6
University of Limerick (IE), Brf (Brazil) (BR), Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
University of Limerick, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.