A Discussion on Ethical Status of Zoos: Do We Really Need Them?

This study aims to develop a comprehensive ethical framework for evaluating the role of zoos, critically examining both supporting and opposing viewpoints. Proponents argue that zoos play a crucial role in species conservation through managed breeding programs, while also providing valuable educational and scientific opportunities that enhance public awareness of wildlife conservation. Conversely, critics raise ethical concerns regarding animal welfare, captivity, and the psychological effects of confinement. Recognizing the significance of these arguments, this study explores alternative models to traditional zoos, advocating for innovative approaches that prioritize animal well-being while fulfilling conservation goals. Additionally, the research underscores the importance of governmental intervention in shaping ethical zoological practices through robust legal frameworks. As perspectives on animal rights continue to evolve, recent legal developments increasingly recognize animals as sentient beings rather than mere property, aligning with contemporary ethical and legal standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Inquiry
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37093/ijsi.1492943
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Discussion on Ethical Status of Zoos: Do We Really Need Them?

Osman Zeybek
International Journal of Social Inquiry
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
article

A Discussion on Ethical Status of Zoos: Do We Really Need Them?

Osman Zeybek
article en

Abstract

This study aims to develop a comprehensive ethical framework for evaluating the role of zoos, critically examining both supporting and opposing viewpoints. Proponents argue that zoos play a crucial role in species conservation through managed breeding programs, while also providing valuable educational and scientific opportunities that enhance public awareness of wildlife conservation. Conversely, critics raise ethical concerns regarding animal welfare, captivity, and the psychological effects of confinement. Recognizing the significance of these arguments, this study explores alternative models to traditional zoos, advocating for innovative approaches that prioritize animal well-being while fulfilling conservation goals. Additionally, the research underscores the importance of governmental intervention in shaping ethical zoological practices through robust legal frameworks. As perspectives on animal rights continue to evolve, recent legal developments increasingly recognize animals as sentient beings rather than mere property, aligning with contemporary ethical and legal standards.

International Journal of Social InquiryVol. 18(2)
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Discussion on Ethical Status of Zoos: Do We Really Need Them? — Osman Zeybek · International Journal of Social Inquiry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS