Evaluating Text Input Methods on the Apple Vision Pro: A Comparison of Tap Typing and Gaze + Pinch

The mixed reality headset, Apple Vision Pro (AVP), features advanced eye- and hand-tracking capabilities and offers two text input methods on a virtual keyboard—Tap Typing (TT) and Gaze + Pinch (GP). Twenty participants completed a text entry task using standardized phrase sets with both methods, followed by a set of questionnaires evaluating perceived usability, subjective workload, eye fatigue, simulator sickness, user experience, and perceived exertion. Objective performance results revealed significantly faster typing speed with TT compared to GP and significantly fewer errors with TT compared to GP. Participants generally preferred TT ( n = 15) over GP ( n = 5), as well as significant differences in perceived usability, select subjective workload subscales, and user experience ratings. Participant feedback and suggestions are discussed, and implications for future design and research directions are explored.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251367736
Primary Topic
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Text Input Methods on the Apple Vision Pro: A Comparison of Tap Typing and Gaze + Pinch

Barbara S. Chaparro, Helen Arnold, Lucas M. Epperson
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
article

Evaluating Text Input Methods on the Apple Vision Pro: A Comparison of Tap Typing and Gaze + Pinch

Barbara S. Chaparro, Helen Arnold, Lucas M. Epperson
article en

Abstract

The mixed reality headset, Apple Vision Pro (AVP), features advanced eye- and hand-tracking capabilities and offers two text input methods on a virtual keyboard—Tap Typing (TT) and Gaze + Pinch (GP). Twenty participants completed a text entry task using standardized phrase sets with both methods, followed by a set of questionnaires evaluating perceived usability, subjective workload, eye fatigue, simulator sickness, user experience, and perceived exertion. Objective performance results revealed significantly faster typing speed with TT compared to GP and significantly fewer errors with TT compared to GP. Participants generally preferred TT ( n = 15) over GP ( n = 5), as well as significant differences in perceived usability, select subjective workload subscales, and user experience ratings. Participant feedback and suggestions are discussed, and implications for future design and research directions are explored.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 69(1)
Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Text Input Methods on the Apple Vision Pro: A Comparison of Tap Typing and Gaze + Pinch — Barbara S. Chaparro, Helen Arnold, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS