Pre‐Conditioning and Post‐Conditioning of Ischemia Reperfused Rat Hearts: Sustained Protection in Normal Hearts; Ineffective in PM <sub>2.5</sub> Exposed Hearts Due to Toxicity

The present study addresses the toxicological impact of Particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) exposure on the pharmacological efficacy of ischemia preconditioning (IPC) and postconditioning (POC) against ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. The primary motivation for this study is the gap in knowledge regarding the effectiveness of IPC and POC in PM<sub>2.5</sub> modified hearts. With the increasing prevalence of cardiac procedures involving IR and PM<sub>2.5</sub> toxicity, there is a growing need to understand their interaction. Female Wistar rats were subjected to PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure for 3 h daily over a period of 21 days. Subsequently, their hearts were excised and mounted on a Langendorff perfusion apparatus. Three cycles of IPC and POC were applied, followed by the IR protocol. In contrast to hearts under normal conditions, neither IPC nor POC could reduce cardiac injury (infarct size, apoptosis, and inflammation) or enhance cardiac function in PM<sub>2.5</sub>-exposed hearts subjected to IR. The underlying reason for this ineffectiveness was identified as the inability to improve mitochondrial bioenergetic function and the expression of the declined master regulator gene Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC1-α). Additionally, the compromised mitochondrial quality control genes resulting from PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure could not be restored to their normal levels by these conventional strategies. Furthermore, the crucial pro-survival signaling pathways like phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/AKT) could not be reactivated by these strategies in PM<sub>2.5</sub>-exposed hearts undergoing IR, consequently preventing the restoration of cardioprotection. From the above results, we deduce that the therapeutic benefits of mechanical conditioning techniques such as IPC and POC were compromised in hearts exposed to PM<sub>2.5</sub>, primarily attributed to PM<sub>2.5</sub> induced mitochondrial dysfunction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.70471
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pre‐Conditioning and Post‐Conditioning of Ischemia Reperfused Rat Hearts: Sustained Protection in Normal Hearts; Ineffective in PM 2.5 Exposed Hearts Due to Toxicity

Gino A. Kurian, Bhavana Sivakumar
1 citations
Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology
Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
1.47
article

Pre‐Conditioning and Post‐Conditioning of Ischemia Reperfused Rat Hearts: Sustained Protection in Normal Hearts; Ineffective in PM 2.5 Exposed Hearts Due to Toxicity

Gino A. Kurian, Bhavana Sivakumar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The present study addresses the toxicological impact of Particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) exposure on the pharmacological efficacy of ischemia preconditioning (IPC) and postconditioning (POC) against ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. The primary motivation for this study is the gap in knowledge regarding the effectiveness of IPC and POC in PM<sub>2.5</sub> modified hearts. With the increasing prevalence of cardiac procedures involving IR and PM<sub>2.5</sub> toxicity, there is a growing need to understand their interaction. Female Wistar rats were subjected to PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure for 3 h daily over a period of 21 days. Subsequently, their hearts were excised and mounted on a Langendorff perfusion apparatus. Three cycles of IPC and POC were applied, followed by the IR protocol. In contrast to hearts under normal conditions, neither IPC nor POC could reduce cardiac injury (infarct size, apoptosis, and inflammation) or enhance cardiac function in PM<sub>2.5</sub>-exposed hearts subjected to IR. The underlying reason for this ineffectiveness was identified as the inability to improve mitochondrial bioenergetic function and the expression of the declined master regulator gene Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC1-α). Additionally, the compromised mitochondrial quality control genes resulting from PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure could not be restored to their normal levels by these conventional strategies. Furthermore, the crucial pro-survival signaling pathways like phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/AKT) could not be reactivated by these strategies in PM<sub>2.5</sub>-exposed hearts undergoing IR, consequently preventing the restoration of cardioprotection. From the above results, we deduce that the therapeutic benefits of mechanical conditioning techniques such as IPC and POC were compromised in hearts exposed to PM<sub>2.5</sub>, primarily attributed to PM<sub>2.5</sub> induced mitochondrial dysfunction.

Journal of Biochemical and Molecular ToxicologyVol. 39(9)
University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US), SASTRA University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.