Comparison of Linear MPC and Explicit MPC for Battery Cell Balancing Control

This paper presents and compares two model predictive control (MPC) approaches for battery cell state-of-charge (SOC) balancing. In both approaches, a linearized discrete-time model that takes into account individual cell capacities is used. The first approach is a linear MPC controller that effectively regulates multiple cells to track a target SOC level while satisfying physical constraints. The second approach is based on explicit MPC implementation to reduce online computation while achieving a comparable performance. The simulation results suggest that explicit MPC can deliver the same balancing performance as linear MPC, while achieving faster online execution. Specifically, explicit MPC reduces the computation time by 37.3% in a five-cell battery example, with the cost of higher offline computation. However, simulation results also reveal a significant limitation for explicit MPC for battery systems with a larger number of cells. As the number of cells increases and/or the prediction horizon increases, the computational requirements grow exponentially, making its application to SOC balancing for large battery systems impractical. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that compares MPC and explicit MPC algorithms in the context of battery cell balancing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Algorithms
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/a18090548
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Linear MPC and Explicit MPC for Battery Cell Balancing Control

Jun Chen, Wenxian Yang
Algorithms
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
article

Comparison of Linear MPC and Explicit MPC for Battery Cell Balancing Control

Jun Chen, Wenxian Yang
article en

Abstract

This paper presents and compares two model predictive control (MPC) approaches for battery cell state-of-charge (SOC) balancing. In both approaches, a linearized discrete-time model that takes into account individual cell capacities is used. The first approach is a linear MPC controller that effectively regulates multiple cells to track a target SOC level while satisfying physical constraints. The second approach is based on explicit MPC implementation to reduce online computation while achieving a comparable performance. The simulation results suggest that explicit MPC can deliver the same balancing performance as linear MPC, while achieving faster online execution. Specifically, explicit MPC reduces the computation time by 37.3% in a five-cell battery example, with the cost of higher offline computation. However, simulation results also reveal a significant limitation for explicit MPC for battery systems with a larger number of cells. As the number of cells increases and/or the prediction horizon increases, the computational requirements grow exponentially, making its application to SOC balancing for large battery systems impractical. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that compares MPC and explicit MPC algorithms in the context of battery cell balancing.

AlgorithmsVol. 18(9)
Oakland University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Linear MPC and Explicit MPC for Battery Cell Balancing Control — Jun Chen, Wenxian Yang · Algorithms (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS