“Long‐Term Temporary” Disaster Recovery Housing: Living in <scp>RVs</scp> Post‐Wildfire

ABSTRACT Sociological research has begun to examine how individuals and communities stabilize, recover, and rebuild post‐disaster, highlighting the importance of housing through the broader recovery process, which often takes multiple years. Wildfire impacts and losses have been increasingly studied by sociologists, but the recovery process has not been well examined in the rural context. This article builds on the nexus of housing, rural, and disaster recovery scholarship to explore the use of recreational vehicles (RVs) as an informal, post‐disaster housing strategy. Using qualitative research conducted with a rural community in Oregon post‐wildfire, we explain why residents choose RVs and what the experience is like for them. Although RV living is affordable and bolsters long‐time place‐based and RV community connections, it also exacerbates pre‐fire vulnerabilities and creates new sources of hardship and stress. RVs may function as a quick coping strategy for post‐disaster housing and reflect rural self‐reliance and community resilience, but we argue they are also a source of future disaster vulnerability that requires institutional intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rural Sociology
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.70019
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Long‐Term Temporary” Disaster Recovery Housing: Living in RVs Post‐Wildfire

Haisu Huang, Claire W. Herbert
1 citations
Rural Sociology
Disaster Management and Resilience
4.20
article

“Long‐Term Temporary” Disaster Recovery Housing: Living in RVs Post‐Wildfire

Haisu Huang, Claire W. Herbert
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sociological research has begun to examine how individuals and communities stabilize, recover, and rebuild post‐disaster, highlighting the importance of housing through the broader recovery process, which often takes multiple years. Wildfire impacts and losses have been increasingly studied by sociologists, but the recovery process has not been well examined in the rural context. This article builds on the nexus of housing, rural, and disaster recovery scholarship to explore the use of recreational vehicles (RVs) as an informal, post‐disaster housing strategy. Using qualitative research conducted with a rural community in Oregon post‐wildfire, we explain why residents choose RVs and what the experience is like for them. Although RV living is affordable and bolsters long‐time place‐based and RV community connections, it also exacerbates pre‐fire vulnerabilities and creates new sources of hardship and stress. RVs may function as a quick coping strategy for post‐disaster housing and reflect rural self‐reliance and community resilience, but we argue they are also a source of future disaster vulnerability that requires institutional intervention.

Rural SociologyVol. 90(3)
William & Mary (US), University of Oregon (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Disaster Management and Resilience
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.