Primary and Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Custom-Made 3D-Printed Baseplates for Severe Multiplanar Glenoid Bone Defects: A Retrospective Study of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

<b>Background:</b> Severe glenoid bone loss presents a major challenge in both primary and revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Standard implants often fail to achieve reliable fixation in these cases. Custom-made, 3D-printed glenoid components have emerged as a potential solution, offering anatomically tailored fit and fixation. This study evaluates the clinical and radiographic outcomes of custom-made glenoid implants in managing severe glenoid bone loss. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective, multicenter study was conducted on 23 shoulders (11 primary and 12 revision RSAs) that received a custom-made glenoid component using the Enovis ProMade System (San Daniele del Friuli, Udine, Italy) between 2017 and 2022, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Preoperative planning utilized CT-based 3D modeling to design implants with patient-specific instrumentation. Clinical outcomes (ROM, pain, Constant-Murley score) and radiographic results were assessed. Statistical comparisons were made between primary and revision groups. <b>Results:</b> Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in shoulder mobility, pain relief, and Constant-Murley scores (all <i>p</i> < 0.001), with no significant differences between primary and revision groups in delta scores. Radiographically, no loosening was observed, with minimal radiolucent lines and low complication rates. Four cases of instability occurred, all in the revision group, with only one requiring conversion to hemiarthroplasty. No differences in radiographic outcomes were observed between groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> Custom-made glenoid implants provide a reliable solution for severe glenoid bone loss in both primary and revision RSA, yielding consistent functional improvement and implant stability. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts and long-term follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings and assess cost-effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176153
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Primary and Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Custom-Made 3D-Printed Baseplates for Severe Multiplanar Glenoid Bone Defects: A Retrospective Study of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

Fabiana Magrini Pasquinelli, Paolo Paladini, Gian Mario Micheloni, Giovanni Merolla et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Primary and Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Custom-Made 3D-Printed Baseplates for Severe Multiplanar Glenoid Bone Defects: A Retrospective Study of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

Fabiana Magrini Pasquinelli, Paolo Paladini, Gian Mario Micheloni, Giovanni Merolla, Roberto Castricini, Giuseppe Porcellini, Francesco De Filippo
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Severe glenoid bone loss presents a major challenge in both primary and revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Standard implants often fail to achieve reliable fixation in these cases. Custom-made, 3D-printed glenoid components have emerged as a potential solution, offering anatomically tailored fit and fixation. This study evaluates the clinical and radiographic outcomes of custom-made glenoid implants in managing severe glenoid bone loss. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective, multicenter study was conducted on 23 shoulders (11 primary and 12 revision RSAs) that received a custom-made glenoid component using the Enovis ProMade System (San Daniele del Friuli, Udine, Italy) between 2017 and 2022, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Preoperative planning utilized CT-based 3D modeling to design implants with patient-specific instrumentation. Clinical outcomes (ROM, pain, Constant-Murley score) and radiographic results were assessed. Statistical comparisons were made between primary and revision groups. <b>Results:</b> Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in shoulder mobility, pain relief, and Constant-Murley scores (all <i>p</i> < 0.001), with no significant differences between primary and revision groups in delta scores. Radiographically, no loosening was observed, with minimal radiolucent lines and low complication rates. Four cases of instability occurred, all in the revision group, with only one requiring conversion to hemiarthroplasty. No differences in radiographic outcomes were observed between groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> Custom-made glenoid implants provide a reliable solution for severe glenoid bone loss in both primary and revision RSA, yielding consistent functional improvement and implant stability. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts and long-term follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings and assess cost-effectiveness.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(17)
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), CTO Hospital (IT), Ospedale Cervesi di Cattolica (IT), Marin Community Foundation (US), Villa Torri Hospital (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.