Validating mouse-tracking in economic research: insights from a discrete choice experiment

Abstract Recent advances in process-tracing technologies allow economists to account for attention in economic models. We use a discrete choice experiment in a hypothetical nutritional context to examine the suitability of mouse-tracking for stated preference research and the insights it provides into human behaviour. Consistent with eye-tracking literature, respondents selectively attend to available information, potentially reallocating attention to maximize utility. Attention to nutrients correlates with their perceived value but weakly predicts preferences. A comparison of choices with and without mouse-tracking suggests that this tracking method does not interfere with decision-making in a substantial way, supporting its validity in experimental research. We conclude that mouse-tracking holds potential for enhancing stated preference studies, but caution is needed when inferring behaviours from these measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Q Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoaf023
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating mouse-tracking in economic research: insights from a discrete choice experiment

Ariane Kehlbacher, Kelvin Balcombe, Oana-Adelina Tanasache
Q Open
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

Validating mouse-tracking in economic research: insights from a discrete choice experiment

Ariane Kehlbacher, Kelvin Balcombe, Oana-Adelina Tanasache
article en

Abstract

Abstract Recent advances in process-tracing technologies allow economists to account for attention in economic models. We use a discrete choice experiment in a hypothetical nutritional context to examine the suitability of mouse-tracking for stated preference research and the insights it provides into human behaviour. Consistent with eye-tracking literature, respondents selectively attend to available information, potentially reallocating attention to maximize utility. Attention to nutrients correlates with their perceived value but weakly predicts preferences. A comparison of choices with and without mouse-tracking suggests that this tracking method does not interfere with decision-making in a substantial way, supporting its validity in experimental research. We conclude that mouse-tracking holds potential for enhancing stated preference studies, but caution is needed when inferring behaviours from these measures.

Q OpenVol. 5(2)
The Open University (GB), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), Moscow Open Social University (RU), University of Reading (GB)
University of Reading
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.