Synergistic effect and kinetic evaluation of swine manure and waste kitchen oil co-digestion

While different biomass sources were commonly used in biogas systems, the synergistic effect was controversial, and the variety of models and criteria made it difficult to determine a best-fit equation. In this study, the evaluation of synergistic benefits and kinetic parameters was performed in a batch study fed by swine manure (SM) and waste kitchen oil (WKO) with four treatments (M4 (4 g-VSSM/L), M4F1, M4F2, and F2 (2 g-VSWKO/L)) and the control. The addition of WKO significantly increased the biogas yield (up to 1527±131 mL/g-VS), compared to 827 ± 109 mL/g-VS of SM mono-digestion, due to the higher biogas potential of WKO than that of SM. However, the co-digestion performance index (CPI) and linear relationship indicated no synergistic benefit. The kinetic analysis showed that the oily material had a longer lag phase (up to 0.65 d) compared to SM, indicating the necessity of combining the two substrates for system optimization. Four kinetic models exhibited high accuracy, and the Cone equation showed a better result on the longer lag-phase treatment. The high correlations between the AIC and BIC (R2=1), or MAPE and RMSE (R2=0.997), demonstrated the consistency between those parameters. The study revealed the consistency of CPI and linear regression to determine synergistic benefits, and kinetic parameters to evaluate the simulated models in AD systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107092
Primary Topic
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synergistic effect and kinetic evaluation of swine manure and waste kitchen oil co-digestion

Cuong Manh Duong, Thu Thi Hong, Teng‐Teeh Lim
Results in Engineering
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
article

Synergistic effect and kinetic evaluation of swine manure and waste kitchen oil co-digestion

Cuong Manh Duong, Thu Thi Hong, Teng‐Teeh Lim
article en

Abstract

While different biomass sources were commonly used in biogas systems, the synergistic effect was controversial, and the variety of models and criteria made it difficult to determine a best-fit equation. In this study, the evaluation of synergistic benefits and kinetic parameters was performed in a batch study fed by swine manure (SM) and waste kitchen oil (WKO) with four treatments (M4 (4 g-VSSM/L), M4F1, M4F2, and F2 (2 g-VSWKO/L)) and the control. The addition of WKO significantly increased the biogas yield (up to 1527±131 mL/g-VS), compared to 827 ± 109 mL/g-VS of SM mono-digestion, due to the higher biogas potential of WKO than that of SM. However, the co-digestion performance index (CPI) and linear relationship indicated no synergistic benefit. The kinetic analysis showed that the oily material had a longer lag phase (up to 0.65 d) compared to SM, indicating the necessity of combining the two substrates for system optimization. Four kinetic models exhibited high accuracy, and the Cone equation showed a better result on the longer lag-phase treatment. The high correlations between the AIC and BIC (R2=1), or MAPE and RMSE (R2=0.997), demonstrated the consistency between those parameters. The study revealed the consistency of CPI and linear regression to determine synergistic benefits, and kinetic parameters to evaluate the simulated models in AD systems.

Results in EngineeringVol. 28
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.