PATIENTS’ EXPERIENCE OF THE NEURO-ONCOLOGY JOURNEY: INTERIM ANALYSIS OF A SINGLE-CENTRE EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Abstract AIMS To evaluate the patients’ experience and perception of the neuro-oncology diagnostic and treatment journey. METHODS A retrospective cross-sectional survey was provided to adult patients (aged>16 years) with a diagnosis of a high- grade glioma, recruited from the outpatient neurosurgery and oncology clinics. The survey was administered alongside a short, structured interview. Baseline data on age, gender, lesion type and location and treatment received to date was collected. This is an interim analysis with a target recruitment of 40 patients. RESULTS 21 patients (10 females) were recruited with a median age of 53 (43-62) years. Glioblastoma multiforme was the most common entity (n=17) followed by IDH-mutant astrocytoma (n=3) and oligodendroglioma (n=1). Five patients were recruited at the point of diagnosis, whilst the remaining cohort had progressed to oncological treatment. Patients at our institution see the same Consultant Oncologist, but the Neurosurgeon and neuro-oncology Clini- cal Nurse Specialist (CNS) may vary. Despite valuing being under the care of the same Consultant Neurosurgeon, 12 patients (60%) prioritise surgery timing, whilst 8 (40%) prefer the Neurosurgeon they met during the clinic perform the surgery if it meets national target times, with no difference between point of diagnosis or oncolog- ical follow-up (p=0.447) All patients greatly valued the input provided by the CNS team, and 13 patients (61%) would prefer being accom- panied by the same CNSs to both neurosurgery and oncology appointments to minimise the need to re-explore their journey regularly. Patients highlighted the anxiety of receiving a brain tumour diagnosis, and the CNS team were consistently available to provide further clarification, address concerns, and provide consistency in patients’ journeys. CONCLUSION This interim analysis highlighted patients’ preference for early surgery over operator and the role CNSs plays in their follow-up and care. However, we understand that each journey is unique, as are patients’ preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf185.043
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PATIENTS’ EXPERIENCE OF THE NEURO-ONCOLOGY JOURNEY: INTERIM ANALYSIS OF A SINGLE-CENTRE EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

William Garratt, Victoria Wykes, Arnav Singh, Paul Sanghera et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

PATIENTS’ EXPERIENCE OF THE NEURO-ONCOLOGY JOURNEY: INTERIM ANALYSIS OF A SINGLE-CENTRE EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

William Garratt, Victoria Wykes, Arnav Singh, Paul Sanghera, Colin Watts, Vinton W.T. Cheng, Frederick Berki, Vassili Crispi, Dinesh Yasothkumar, Helen Benghiat, Sarah Freeth, Sara Meade, Naomi Cole, Sana Manan
article en

Abstract

Abstract AIMS To evaluate the patients’ experience and perception of the neuro-oncology diagnostic and treatment journey. METHODS A retrospective cross-sectional survey was provided to adult patients (aged>16 years) with a diagnosis of a high- grade glioma, recruited from the outpatient neurosurgery and oncology clinics. The survey was administered alongside a short, structured interview. Baseline data on age, gender, lesion type and location and treatment received to date was collected. This is an interim analysis with a target recruitment of 40 patients. RESULTS 21 patients (10 females) were recruited with a median age of 53 (43-62) years. Glioblastoma multiforme was the most common entity (n=17) followed by IDH-mutant astrocytoma (n=3) and oligodendroglioma (n=1). Five patients were recruited at the point of diagnosis, whilst the remaining cohort had progressed to oncological treatment. Patients at our institution see the same Consultant Oncologist, but the Neurosurgeon and neuro-oncology Clini- cal Nurse Specialist (CNS) may vary. Despite valuing being under the care of the same Consultant Neurosurgeon, 12 patients (60%) prioritise surgery timing, whilst 8 (40%) prefer the Neurosurgeon they met during the clinic perform the surgery if it meets national target times, with no difference between point of diagnosis or oncolog- ical follow-up (p=0.447) All patients greatly valued the input provided by the CNS team, and 13 patients (61%) would prefer being accom- panied by the same CNSs to both neurosurgery and oncology appointments to minimise the need to re-explore their journey regularly. Patients highlighted the anxiety of receiving a brain tumour diagnosis, and the CNS team were consistently available to provide further clarification, address concerns, and provide consistency in patients’ journeys. CONCLUSION This interim analysis highlighted patients’ preference for early surgery over operator and the role CNSs plays in their follow-up and care. However, we understand that each journey is unique, as are patients’ preferences.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_2)
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.