INTEGRATING FUNCTIONAL PRECISION MEDICINE WITH PATIENT AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT (PPIE) IN THE PEAR-GLIO TRIAL FOR BRAIN TUMOUR TREATMENT OPTIMISATION

Abstract AIMS PEAR-GLIO evaluates the feasibility of a functional precision medicine (FPM) platform test to predict therapeutic sensitivity for drugs and combinatorial regimens using patient-derived tumour samples. The PPIE workstream explored the perceptions of FPM, barriers to trial participation, strategies to improve engagement as well as a better understanding on the utility, accessibility, and challenges of the FPM test. METHODS As part of the PEAR-GLIO trial, two PPIE sessions were conducted with 43 participants (27 patients and 15 caregivers) and a focus group/online survey for healthcare professionals (distributed to 128 healthcare professionals). We analysed responses and discussion to identify themes and inform trial processes. These sessions were facilitated by an experienced Research Practitioner and conducted with brainstrust. RESULTS Participants expressed enthusiasm for the FPM platform, highlighting its potential to improve outcomes by enabling personalised treatment decisions and shared decision-making with clinicians. Concerns included lim- ited tissue availability for testing, the need for clear communication about test results, and possible emotional impacts if treatments were unavailable. Recommendations included early trial enrollment (pre-surgery), trans- parent result reporting, and educating healthcare professionals about FPM. Healthcare professionals wanted to: understand the validation as it improved the comfortability for them to use to the test; know where it fits into clinical pathway and have some data. Notably, baseline skepticism about FPM shifted to optimism and hopefulness by the end of the sessions, as evidenced by positive word cloud responses. CONCLUSION Incorporating PPIE into the PEAR-GLIO study fostered a deeper understanding of patient and caregiver needs, revealing broad support for FPM and valuable insights to refine trial design. By addressing concerns and en- hancing patient-clinician collaboration, the platform has the potential to improve brain tumour care and a vance precision oncology. Future work will extend to healthcare professional perspectives and broader dissemination of trial findings to ensure equitable access and adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf185.005
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INTEGRATING FUNCTIONAL PRECISION MEDICINE WITH PATIENT AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT (PPIE) IN THE PEAR-GLIO TRIAL FOR BRAIN TUMOUR TREATMENT OPTIMISATION

Waqar Saleem, Helen Bulbeck, Eleonora Peerani, E. H. Williams et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

INTEGRATING FUNCTIONAL PRECISION MEDICINE WITH PATIENT AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT (PPIE) IN THE PEAR-GLIO TRIAL FOR BRAIN TUMOUR TREATMENT OPTIMISATION

Waqar Saleem, Helen Bulbeck, Eleonora Peerani, E. H. Williams, Adam Thomson, Miss Lillie Pakzad-Shahabi
article en

Abstract

Abstract AIMS PEAR-GLIO evaluates the feasibility of a functional precision medicine (FPM) platform test to predict therapeutic sensitivity for drugs and combinatorial regimens using patient-derived tumour samples. The PPIE workstream explored the perceptions of FPM, barriers to trial participation, strategies to improve engagement as well as a better understanding on the utility, accessibility, and challenges of the FPM test. METHODS As part of the PEAR-GLIO trial, two PPIE sessions were conducted with 43 participants (27 patients and 15 caregivers) and a focus group/online survey for healthcare professionals (distributed to 128 healthcare professionals). We analysed responses and discussion to identify themes and inform trial processes. These sessions were facilitated by an experienced Research Practitioner and conducted with brainstrust. RESULTS Participants expressed enthusiasm for the FPM platform, highlighting its potential to improve outcomes by enabling personalised treatment decisions and shared decision-making with clinicians. Concerns included lim- ited tissue availability for testing, the need for clear communication about test results, and possible emotional impacts if treatments were unavailable. Recommendations included early trial enrollment (pre-surgery), trans- parent result reporting, and educating healthcare professionals about FPM. Healthcare professionals wanted to: understand the validation as it improved the comfortability for them to use to the test; know where it fits into clinical pathway and have some data. Notably, baseline skepticism about FPM shifted to optimism and hopefulness by the end of the sessions, as evidenced by positive word cloud responses. CONCLUSION Incorporating PPIE into the PEAR-GLIO study fostered a deeper understanding of patient and caregiver needs, revealing broad support for FPM and valuable insights to refine trial design. By addressing concerns and en- hancing patient-clinician collaboration, the platform has the potential to improve brain tumour care and a vance precision oncology. Future work will extend to healthcare professional perspectives and broader dissemination of trial findings to ensure equitable access and adoption.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 27(Supplement_2)
Entrust (GB), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), University of Bristol (GB), London Biofoundry (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.