Model of contracting with the indirect treatment paraclinical units of the social security organization

This study aimed to develop a model for contracting with the indirect treatment paraclinical units of the social security organization. Using a mixed exploratory design, the research was conducted in two consecutive stages: qualitative and quantitative. Data were collected through questionnaires developed by the researchers based on the conceptual model and analyzed using AMOS software. Thematic analysis of the interviews identified 176 primary codes, which were refined into 78 initial codes, grouped into 26 main themes and 10 factors. These factors included demographics, economic considerations, acculturation, specialization, physical conditions, staff literacy and experience, performance management, marketing, customer satisfaction, and external influences. The 10 factors significantly influenced the contracting criteria of the indirect treatment paraclinical units of the social security organization. The results of the Friedman test indicated that demographic factors had the greatest impact, followed by external factors, economic factors, customer satisfaction, marketing, staff literacy and experience, cultural background, specialization, physical factors, and performance management. The proposed model proved to be an effective tool for contracting indirect treatment paraclinical units within the social security organization, offering a structured approach to improving the efficiency and effectiveness of service delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Selva Andina Research Society
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36610/j.jsars.20252333
Primary Topic
Labor Market and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model of contracting with the indirect treatment paraclinical units of the social security organization

Ali Maher, Mehrnoosh Jafari, Khalil Alimohammadzadeh, Sina Salehi Darabi et al.
Journal of the Selva Andina Research Society
Labor Market and Education
article

Model of contracting with the indirect treatment paraclinical units of the social security organization

Ali Maher, Mehrnoosh Jafari, Khalil Alimohammadzadeh, Sina Salehi Darabi, Mojtaba Hosseini Seyed
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a model for contracting with the indirect treatment paraclinical units of the social security organization. Using a mixed exploratory design, the research was conducted in two consecutive stages: qualitative and quantitative. Data were collected through questionnaires developed by the researchers based on the conceptual model and analyzed using AMOS software. Thematic analysis of the interviews identified 176 primary codes, which were refined into 78 initial codes, grouped into 26 main themes and 10 factors. These factors included demographics, economic considerations, acculturation, specialization, physical conditions, staff literacy and experience, performance management, marketing, customer satisfaction, and external influences. The 10 factors significantly influenced the contracting criteria of the indirect treatment paraclinical units of the social security organization. The results of the Friedman test indicated that demographic factors had the greatest impact, followed by external factors, economic factors, customer satisfaction, marketing, staff literacy and experience, cultural background, specialization, physical factors, and performance management. The proposed model proved to be an effective tool for contracting indirect treatment paraclinical units within the social security organization, offering a structured approach to improving the efficiency and effectiveness of service delivery.

Journal of the Selva Andina Research SocietyVol. 16(2)
Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR), Islamic Azad University North Tehran Branch (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Labor Market and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.