Preclinical safety and feasibility of a bupivacaine-loaded hydrogel for pain relief after spinal surgery

Pain and side effects of analgesics hinder postoperative recovery after instrumented spine surgery. Current locoregional blocks and sustained-release formulations are limited by rapid systemic absorption. We evaluated the local and systemic safety of a bupivacaine-loaded hydrogel, co-implanted with pedicle screws, in a sheep spine surgery model. Gelatin-based ring-shaped hydrogels containing bupivacaine crystals (305 mg total) were implanted with screws in eight sheep (Group C). Control groups included screws only (Group A), screws with unloaded hydrogels (Group B), and subcutaneous (SC) bupivacaine infiltration (150 mg, Group D). Plasma drug levels, systemic safety parameters, and histological host reaction at 6 and 56 days were assessed. All animals recovered without complications. Group D showed a Cmax of 138.3 ± 68.5 ng/mL at 1 h, while Group C had a lower Cmax of 50.4 ± 24.5 ng/mL at 28 h. The elimination half-life (T1/2) in Group C was 6.5 times longer than in Group D (67.6 ± 15.6 vs. 10.7 ± 5.5 h). Histology showed no differences in host reaction between groups. In conclusion, bupivacaine-loaded hydrogel was well-tolerated locally and systemically, with prolonged drug release and lower systemic exposure than SC infiltration. This approach shows promise for sustained postoperative analgesia in spine surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17790-9
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preclinical safety and feasibility of a bupivacaine-loaded hydrogel for pain relief after spinal surgery

Andre J. Smorenburg, Jorrit‐Jan Verlaan, Floris R. van Tol, Bas J. Oosterman et al.
Scientific Reports
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Preclinical safety and feasibility of a bupivacaine-loaded hydrogel for pain relief after spinal surgery

Andre J. Smorenburg, Jorrit‐Jan Verlaan, Floris R. van Tol, Bas J. Oosterman, Jasper G. Steverink, Susanna Piluso, Kwame Amponsah, Suzanne Bruins, Hein Jonkman, Jessica Marvela
article en

Abstract

Pain and side effects of analgesics hinder postoperative recovery after instrumented spine surgery. Current locoregional blocks and sustained-release formulations are limited by rapid systemic absorption. We evaluated the local and systemic safety of a bupivacaine-loaded hydrogel, co-implanted with pedicle screws, in a sheep spine surgery model. Gelatin-based ring-shaped hydrogels containing bupivacaine crystals (305 mg total) were implanted with screws in eight sheep (Group C). Control groups included screws only (Group A), screws with unloaded hydrogels (Group B), and subcutaneous (SC) bupivacaine infiltration (150 mg, Group D). Plasma drug levels, systemic safety parameters, and histological host reaction at 6 and 56 days were assessed. All animals recovered without complications. Group D showed a Cmax of 138.3 ± 68.5 ng/mL at 1 h, while Group C had a lower Cmax of 50.4 ± 24.5 ng/mL at 28 h. The elimination half-life (T1/2) in Group C was 6.5 times longer than in Group D (67.6 ± 15.6 vs. 10.7 ± 5.5 h). Histology showed no differences in host reaction between groups. In conclusion, bupivacaine-loaded hydrogel was well-tolerated locally and systemically, with prolonged drug release and lower systemic exposure than SC infiltration. This approach shows promise for sustained postoperative analgesia in spine surgery.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Genmab (Netherlands) (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.