Does CFSP co-ordination foster convergence? Voting behavior on nuclear weapons at the UN General Assembly

Although the European Union (EU) has sought to promote the approximation of the foreign policy positions of member states since it established its Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) with the Treaty of Maastricht in 1992, the impact of this intergovernmental forum has long been questioned. Recent developments putting the CFSP under strain such as the weakening transatlantic link, Russian attempts to undermine EU foreign policy unity, and the rise of Eurosceptic populist parties call for a reassessment of its convergence-fostering effect. We investigate convergence by looking at EU voting behavior on resolutions on nuclear weapons—a controversial area due to deep divisions among member states—at the United Nations General Assembly from 1979 to 2022. We show that while convergence among CFSP participants hardly increases, the level of consensus remains stable, in a departure from the theoretical expectations of mainstream accounts of EU foreign policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Security Policy
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2025.2551632
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does CFSP co-ordination foster convergence? Voting behavior on nuclear weapons at the UN General Assembly

Michal Onderčo, Clara Portela, Valerio Vignoli
Contemporary Security Policy
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Does CFSP co-ordination foster convergence? Voting behavior on nuclear weapons at the UN General Assembly

Michal Onderčo, Clara Portela, Valerio Vignoli
article en

Abstract

Although the European Union (EU) has sought to promote the approximation of the foreign policy positions of member states since it established its Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) with the Treaty of Maastricht in 1992, the impact of this intergovernmental forum has long been questioned. Recent developments putting the CFSP under strain such as the weakening transatlantic link, Russian attempts to undermine EU foreign policy unity, and the rise of Eurosceptic populist parties call for a reassessment of its convergence-fostering effect. We investigate convergence by looking at EU voting behavior on resolutions on nuclear weapons—a controversial area due to deep divisions among member states—at the United Nations General Assembly from 1979 to 2022. We show that while convergence among CFSP participants hardly increases, the level of consensus remains stable, in a departure from the theoretical expectations of mainstream accounts of EU foreign policy.

Contemporary Security PolicyVol. 46(4)
University of Siena (IT), Universitat de València (ES), Charles University (CZ), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does CFSP co-ordination foster convergence? Voting behavior on nuclear weapons at the UN General Assembly — Michal Onderčo, Clara Portela, et al. · Contemporary Security Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS