Liquidity management of Islamic banks and conventional banks: evidence from IFRS 9
Purpose This study investigates if the implementation of International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS)-9: Financial Instruments (IFRS 9 hereafter) affects a firm’s cash holdings from a developing country perspective. Moreover, we explore whether the above nexus varies between Islamic banks and conventional banks in the same setting. Design/methodology/approach This study covers all the listed banks in Bangladesh. The data period is 2015–2022, which allows the study to have a pre- and post-IFRS 9 impact on corporate cash holdings. We use ordinary least square regression models to test our conjectures. Our entire analysis is based on 232 firm-year observations. Findings The overall findings suggest that the cash holding decreased significantly in post-IFRS 9 periods compared to pre-IFRS 9 periods. We further test whether the impact of IFRS 9 presents heterogeneity between Islamic banks and conventional banks in terms of cash holdings. However, we do not find any variation. Our results remain robust through a set of alternative measures of cash holding and sub-sample analysis. Originality/value Our study presents an empirical analysis of IFRS 9 in general, and in a developing country Bangladesh in particular. Prior research overlooked the possible impact of IFRS 9 from a developing country perspective, hence, this paper contributes to policy development and the literature of IFRS in emerging countries.
Authors
- Muhammad Shahin Miah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2729-6142)
- Chowdhury Saima Ferdous
Institutions
- Dhaka International University (BD)
- University of International Business (KZ)
- International University of Business Agriculture and Technology (BD)
- United International University (BD)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Asian Journal of Accounting Research
- Published
- 2025-09-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1108/ajar-10-2024-0453
- Primary Topic
- Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00