TYPOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES IN EXPERT AND AMATEUR PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTENT IN THE RUSSIAN-LANGUAGE BLOGOSPHERE

This study examines the characteristics of popular psychological discourse in the digital age, where psychology extends beyond scientific and psychotherapeutic domains. The research focuses on the features of online discourse in the blogosphere, characterized by interactivity, hybridity, emotionality, and simplified information delivery, all of which contribute to the popularization of psychological knowledge. The methodology encompasses a range of methods – including content, discourse, comparative, cognitive-discursive, and computational analyses – and is based on the examination of publications by Russian-speaking bloggers and professional psychologists on social networks (YouTube, Telegram) and specialized platforms. Expert content is identified by authors’ relevant education and scientific level of their publications, while amateur discourse is defined as oriented toward the representation of personal experience and subjective perception. The findings reveal genre and communicative differences between expert and amateur popular-psychological content, alongside the phenomenon of discourse hybridization. This review highlights the significance of the blogosphere as a space for science popularization, the formation of experts’ professional image, and providing of psychological support to users, emphasizing the need for a critical approach to evaluating the quality of psychological content in the online environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dynamics of Media Systems
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47475/2949-3390-2025-5-1-659-669
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TYPOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES IN EXPERT AND AMATEUR PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTENT IN THE RUSSIAN-LANGUAGE BLOGOSPHERE

Ksenia V. Zayachkovskaya
Dynamics of Media Systems
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
article

TYPOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES IN EXPERT AND AMATEUR PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTENT IN THE RUSSIAN-LANGUAGE BLOGOSPHERE

Ksenia V. Zayachkovskaya
article en

Abstract

This study examines the characteristics of popular psychological discourse in the digital age, where psychology extends beyond scientific and psychotherapeutic domains. The research focuses on the features of online discourse in the blogosphere, characterized by interactivity, hybridity, emotionality, and simplified information delivery, all of which contribute to the popularization of psychological knowledge. The methodology encompasses a range of methods – including content, discourse, comparative, cognitive-discursive, and computational analyses – and is based on the examination of publications by Russian-speaking bloggers and professional psychologists on social networks (YouTube, Telegram) and specialized platforms. Expert content is identified by authors’ relevant education and scientific level of their publications, while amateur discourse is defined as oriented toward the representation of personal experience and subjective perception. The findings reveal genre and communicative differences between expert and amateur popular-psychological content, alongside the phenomenon of discourse hybridization. This review highlights the significance of the blogosphere as a space for science popularization, the formation of experts’ professional image, and providing of psychological support to users, emphasizing the need for a critical approach to evaluating the quality of psychological content in the online environment.

Dynamics of Media SystemsVol. 5(1)
Pushkin State Russian language Institute (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.