Embodied Sensorimotor (Hyper)intensionality

This article aims to stimulate interdisciplinary exchange between logicians and cognitive scientists. In particular, I claim that conceptual analogues of hyperintensionality and intensionality can be found when we apply statistical tools to analyse sensorimotor processes in embodied cognition. When considering the functional correlation between the internal state X of an agent, and the external state Y of its environment, I propose that the precise functional form of the correlation has a hyperintensional flavour, while the abstract information carried by the correlation has a purely intensional flavour. Recent work by Kolchinsky and Wolpert attempts to bring ‘semantics’ to physical correlations by analysing the effects of those correlations on task performance. I argue that this ‘semantic information’ framework currently provides a model for intensional, but not hyperintensional, aspects of belief in a hypothetical mental arithmetic scenario. In general, I suggest that cognitive scientists should be more familiar with the intensional/hyperintensional distinction (for instance, I argue that the ‘Bayesian brain’ approach cannot account for hyperintensional aspects of cognition), and that logicians should be aware of analogues of hyperintension in embodied cognition (for instance, I claim that hyperintensional-like phenomena occur as much in bacteria as in humans).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Logic and Logical Philosophy
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12775/llp.2025.013
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embodied Sensorimotor (Hyper)intensionality

Colleen GC McGregor
Logic and Logical Philosophy
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

Embodied Sensorimotor (Hyper)intensionality

Colleen GC McGregor
article en

Abstract

This article aims to stimulate interdisciplinary exchange between logicians and cognitive scientists. In particular, I claim that conceptual analogues of hyperintensionality and intensionality can be found when we apply statistical tools to analyse sensorimotor processes in embodied cognition. When considering the functional correlation between the internal state X of an agent, and the external state Y of its environment, I propose that the precise functional form of the correlation has a hyperintensional flavour, while the abstract information carried by the correlation has a purely intensional flavour. Recent work by Kolchinsky and Wolpert attempts to bring ‘semantics’ to physical correlations by analysing the effects of those correlations on task performance. I argue that this ‘semantic information’ framework currently provides a model for intensional, but not hyperintensional, aspects of belief in a hypothetical mental arithmetic scenario. In general, I suggest that cognitive scientists should be more familiar with the intensional/hyperintensional distinction (for instance, I argue that the ‘Bayesian brain’ approach cannot account for hyperintensional aspects of cognition), and that logicians should be aware of analogues of hyperintension in embodied cognition (for instance, I claim that hyperintensional-like phenomena occur as much in bacteria as in humans).

Logic and Logical Philosophy
University of Sussex (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.