Frequency and risk factors for acute pain during vaginal birth with epidural analgesia: a nationwide population-based study from the 2021 French National Perinatal Survey

Epidural analgesia is the gold standard for labor pain relief, but severe pain during childbirth can still occur. We assessed frequency and risk factors for acute pain at vaginal birth among women using epidural analgesia. Data were from the 2021 French National Perinatal Survey, a cross-sectional, nationwide, population-based study. Women who delivered vaginally with epidural analgesia were included. Pain at the time of birth was assessed using a numerical pain rating scale and categorized as (no/mild [0-3], moderate [4-6], or severe pain [7-10]). Determinants of moderate and severe pain were identified using multinomial multilevel logistic regression. Among 7211 women, 16.9% experienced moderate pain and 31.4% severe pain at birth. Risk factors for severe pain included maternal age <25 years (adjusted odds ratio 1.39; 95% confidence interval [1.14-1.70]), overweight (1.40 [1.20-1.63]), obesity (1.44 [1.19-1.73]), pushing effort >30 minutes (1.94 [1.60-2.36]), epidural-to-birth interval <1 hour (3.49 [2.50-4.87]) or ≥10 hours (1.68 [1.38-2.05]), self-reported partially effective (4.73 [4.07-5.49]) or ineffective (21.3 [14.3-31.8]), epidural analgesia and anesthesiologist not dedicated to maternity care (1.33 [1.11-1.58]). Protective factors included maternal age ≥35 years (0.82 [0.69-0.96]), high education (0.81 [0.68-0.96]), and patient-controlled epidural analgesia [PCEA] (0.70 [0.60-0.83]). The combined spinal epidural technique (CSE) was protective among women with effective epidural and exposed for at least 1 hour (0.22 [0.05-0.98]). One in 3 women who delivered vaginally reported severe pain at birth despite epidural analgesia. Expanding the use of PCEA and CSE technique could improve pain management. Increased vigilance is needed for young, overweight/obese women, and those with short or prolonged epidural-to-birth intervals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pain
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003710
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pregnancy-related medical research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frequency and risk factors for acute pain during vaginal birth with epidural analgesia: a nationwide population-based study from the 2021 French National Perinatal Survey

Anne Alice Chantry, Camille Le Ray, Clara Rollet, Nathalie Lelong et al.
1 citations
Pain
Pregnancy-related medical research
1.88
article

Frequency and risk factors for acute pain during vaginal birth with epidural analgesia: a nationwide population-based study from the 2021 French National Perinatal Survey

Anne Alice Chantry, Camille Le Ray, Clara Rollet, Nathalie Lelong, Marie-Pierre Bonnet, Marie Viaud
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Epidural analgesia is the gold standard for labor pain relief, but severe pain during childbirth can still occur. We assessed frequency and risk factors for acute pain at vaginal birth among women using epidural analgesia. Data were from the 2021 French National Perinatal Survey, a cross-sectional, nationwide, population-based study. Women who delivered vaginally with epidural analgesia were included. Pain at the time of birth was assessed using a numerical pain rating scale and categorized as (no/mild [0-3], moderate [4-6], or severe pain [7-10]). Determinants of moderate and severe pain were identified using multinomial multilevel logistic regression. Among 7211 women, 16.9% experienced moderate pain and 31.4% severe pain at birth. Risk factors for severe pain included maternal age <25 years (adjusted odds ratio 1.39; 95% confidence interval [1.14-1.70]), overweight (1.40 [1.20-1.63]), obesity (1.44 [1.19-1.73]), pushing effort >30 minutes (1.94 [1.60-2.36]), epidural-to-birth interval <1 hour (3.49 [2.50-4.87]) or ≥10 hours (1.68 [1.38-2.05]), self-reported partially effective (4.73 [4.07-5.49]) or ineffective (21.3 [14.3-31.8]), epidural analgesia and anesthesiologist not dedicated to maternity care (1.33 [1.11-1.58]). Protective factors included maternal age ≥35 years (0.82 [0.69-0.96]), high education (0.81 [0.68-0.96]), and patient-controlled epidural analgesia [PCEA] (0.70 [0.60-0.83]). The combined spinal epidural technique (CSE) was protective among women with effective epidural and exposed for at least 1 hour (0.22 [0.05-0.98]). One in 3 women who delivered vaginally reported severe pain at birth despite epidural analgesia. Expanding the use of PCEA and CSE technique could improve pain management. Increased vigilance is needed for young, overweight/obese women, and those with short or prolonged epidural-to-birth intervals.

PainVol. 166(11)
Apple (Israel) (IL), Inserm (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Hôpital Armand-Trousseau (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Hôpital Cochin (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Maternité Port Royal (FR), Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique (FR), Groupe de recherche clinique en anesthésie réanimation médecine périopératoire (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Pregnancy-related medical research
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.