Perspectives: LLM agents reshaping the foundation of geotechnical problem-solving

• Discuss potential of Agentic AI application in Geotechnics. • Review the 1st Geotechathon event. • Emphasize the importance of community effort for the future of Geotechnics. This paper explores the transformative potential of Large Language Model (LLM)-based agentic artificial intelligence (AI) in addressing longstanding challenges in geotechnical engineering. It begins by highlighting the significant growth and increasing interest in applying machine learning (ML) and AI techniques across various geotechnical domains, such as soil classification, slope stability analysis, and foundation design. Emphasizing the Gartner Hype Cycle, the authors reflect on the transition from initial enthusiasm toward realistic appraisal and adoption, highlighting current barriers like limited foundational understanding, skepticism about AI reliability, and a lack of standardized practices. The authors then introduce LLM agents as promising solutions for automating the extraction, interpretation, and quantification of qualitative and semi-quantitative geotechnical data. Drawing insights from the 1st GeoTechathon event, an international collaboration involving engineers, data scientists, and AI practitioners, the paper demonstrates practical applications in geotechnical site planning, landslide investigations, liquefaction analysis, and shield tunnel safety evaluation. Each project leveraged basic techniques, including Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), multimodal data integration, and prompt engineering, achieving improvements in efficiency, accuracy, and decision-making processes. The paper concludes by discussing broader implications for interdisciplinary collaboration, ethical considerations, and future directions, emphasizing the necessity for standardized practices, rigorous validation, and enhanced AI literacy to sustainably integrate LLM technologies within the geotechnical engineering community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geodata and AI.
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoai.2025.100036
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Geological Modeling and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives: LLM agents reshaping the foundation of geotechnical problem-solving

Yuanqin Tao, Yu Otake, Stephen Wu, Mingliang Zhou et al.
3 citations
Geodata and AI.
Geological Modeling and Analysis
4.01
article

Perspectives: LLM agents reshaping the foundation of geotechnical problem-solving

Yuanqin Tao, Yu Otake, Stephen Wu, Mingliang Zhou, Alexander K. C. Leung, Zijun Cao, Tomoka Nakamura, Chao Shi, Chisato Konishi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Discuss potential of Agentic AI application in Geotechnics. • Review the 1st Geotechathon event. • Emphasize the importance of community effort for the future of Geotechnics. This paper explores the transformative potential of Large Language Model (LLM)-based agentic artificial intelligence (AI) in addressing longstanding challenges in geotechnical engineering. It begins by highlighting the significant growth and increasing interest in applying machine learning (ML) and AI techniques across various geotechnical domains, such as soil classification, slope stability analysis, and foundation design. Emphasizing the Gartner Hype Cycle, the authors reflect on the transition from initial enthusiasm toward realistic appraisal and adoption, highlighting current barriers like limited foundational understanding, skepticism about AI reliability, and a lack of standardized practices. The authors then introduce LLM agents as promising solutions for automating the extraction, interpretation, and quantification of qualitative and semi-quantitative geotechnical data. Drawing insights from the 1st GeoTechathon event, an international collaboration involving engineers, data scientists, and AI practitioners, the paper demonstrates practical applications in geotechnical site planning, landslide investigations, liquefaction analysis, and shield tunnel safety evaluation. Each project leveraged basic techniques, including Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), multimodal data integration, and prompt engineering, achieving improvements in efficiency, accuracy, and decision-making processes. The paper concludes by discussing broader implications for interdisciplinary collaboration, ethical considerations, and future directions, emphasizing the necessity for standardized practices, rigorous validation, and enhanced AI literacy to sustainably integrate LLM technologies within the geotechnical engineering community.

Geodata and AI.Vol. 4
Tongji University (CN), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Nanyang Technological University (SG), The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI (JP), Tohoku University (JP), Toyo Engineering (Japan) (JP), The Institute of Statistical Mathematics (JP), Research Organization of Information and Systems (JP), Southwest Jiaotong University (CN), Zhejiang University of Technology (CN)
Research Organization of Information and Systems, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Geological Modeling and Analysis
4.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.