FLASH-enabled proton SBRT for a challenging case of spine metastasis

<i>Objective</i>. The FLASH effect, characterized by potential sparing of organs at risk (OARs) through ultra-high dose rate (DR) irradiation, has garnered significant attention for its capability to address indications previously untreatable at conventional DRs with hypofractionated schemes. While considerable biological research is needed to understand the FLASH effect and determine the FLASH modifying factors (FMF) for individual OARs, treatment planning studies have also emerged. This study evaluates the feasibility of achieving FLASH conditions in proton stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases and establishes the required FMFs under different fractionation regimens.<i>Approach</i>. A conformal FLASH Proton SBRT plan was generated for a patient with spine metastasis in a research version of RayStation11B (RaySearch laboratories AB, Stockholm) on an IBA Proteus Plus system. Two oblique posterior beams were used in the plan. The prescribed dose to the CTV was set according to 3 different fractionation regimens: 5 fractions (fx) of 7 Gy, 8 fx of 5 Gy, and 10 fx of 4.2 Gy. Spot filtering and sorting techniques were applied to maximize the 5% pencil beam scanning DR in the spinal cord (SC). The FLASH effect was assumed to be observed within irradiated regions above 40 Gy s<sup>-1</sup>and 4 Gy per fraction.<i>Main results</i>. The generated plans successfully ensure robust target coverage in each fraction. The volume of SC that does not comply with the clinical goal adheres to the FLASH effect conditions in each fraction. Depending on the aforementioned fractionation schemes used, a FMF of approximately 0.6 to 0.8 is necessary to enable such treatment in FLASH conditions.<i>Significance</i>. This study indicates that treating challenging spine metastases with protons using FLASH delivery is technically feasible. However, clinical viability depends on optimistic parameters to trigger the FLASH effect and FMF values below 0.8, which are not yet guaranteed given current research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae023c
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FLASH-enabled proton SBRT for a challenging case of spine metastasis

Edmond Sterpin, John A. Lee, Macarena Chocan Vera, Dario Di Perri et al.
2 citations
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
3.77
article

FLASH-enabled proton SBRT for a challenging case of spine metastasis

Edmond Sterpin, John A. Lee, Macarena Chocan Vera, Dario Di Perri, Xavier Geets, S. Wuyckens, Viktor Wase, Rasmus Nilsson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective</i>. The FLASH effect, characterized by potential sparing of organs at risk (OARs) through ultra-high dose rate (DR) irradiation, has garnered significant attention for its capability to address indications previously untreatable at conventional DRs with hypofractionated schemes. While considerable biological research is needed to understand the FLASH effect and determine the FLASH modifying factors (FMF) for individual OARs, treatment planning studies have also emerged. This study evaluates the feasibility of achieving FLASH conditions in proton stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases and establishes the required FMFs under different fractionation regimens.<i>Approach</i>. A conformal FLASH Proton SBRT plan was generated for a patient with spine metastasis in a research version of RayStation11B (RaySearch laboratories AB, Stockholm) on an IBA Proteus Plus system. Two oblique posterior beams were used in the plan. The prescribed dose to the CTV was set according to 3 different fractionation regimens: 5 fractions (fx) of 7 Gy, 8 fx of 5 Gy, and 10 fx of 4.2 Gy. Spot filtering and sorting techniques were applied to maximize the 5% pencil beam scanning DR in the spinal cord (SC). The FLASH effect was assumed to be observed within irradiated regions above 40 Gy s<sup>-1</sup>and 4 Gy per fraction.<i>Main results</i>. The generated plans successfully ensure robust target coverage in each fraction. The volume of SC that does not comply with the clinical goal adheres to the FLASH effect conditions in each fraction. Depending on the aforementioned fractionation schemes used, a FMF of approximately 0.6 to 0.8 is necessary to enable such treatment in FLASH conditions.<i>Significance</i>. This study indicates that treating challenging spine metastases with protons using FLASH delivery is technically feasible. However, clinical viability depends on optimistic parameters to trigger the FLASH effect and FMF values below 0.8, which are not yet guaranteed given current research.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 70(19)
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE), Institute of Particle Physics (CA), de Duve Institute (BE), RaySearch Laboratories (Sweden) (SE), UCLouvain (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Waalse Gewest
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
3.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.