The Importance of the 24/17 Advisory Opinion (AO) of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights for the Gender Debate in Brazil: An Analysis in the Light of the Declaratory Action of Unconstitutionality (DAU) 4275

This text aims to analyze how the issue of sexual rights has been incorporated into the agenda of the Inter-American Human Rights System, especially concerning the protections of transgender and transsexual people. To this end, it draws on the important and recent Advisory Opinion (AO) 24/17, while also considering the significant impacts of this instrument on Brazilian domestic law, particularly through the Declaratory Action of Unconstitutionality (DAU) 4275/DF of the Federal Supreme Court, highlighting a possible and fruitful dialogue between the Courts. The method used is hermeneutic phenomenology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487872e.2026.26.19432
Primary Topic
Human Rights and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Importance of the 24/17 Advisory Opinion (AO) of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights for the Gender Debate in Brazil: An Analysis in the Light of the Declaratory Action of Unconstitutionality (DAU) 4275

Doglas César Lucas, Pâmela Copetti Ghisleni
Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional
Human Rights and Development
article

The Importance of the 24/17 Advisory Opinion (AO) of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights for the Gender Debate in Brazil: An Analysis in the Light of the Declaratory Action of Unconstitutionality (DAU) 4275

Doglas César Lucas, Pâmela Copetti Ghisleni
article en

Abstract

This text aims to analyze how the issue of sexual rights has been incorporated into the agenda of the Inter-American Human Rights System, especially concerning the protections of transgender and transsexual people. To this end, it draws on the important and recent Advisory Opinion (AO) 24/17, while also considering the significant impacts of this instrument on Brazilian domestic law, particularly through the Declaratory Action of Unconstitutionality (DAU) 4275/DF of the Federal Supreme Court, highlighting a possible and fruitful dialogue between the Courts. The method used is hermeneutic phenomenology.

Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional
Angelo State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Human Rights and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.