Complex choice environments shelter unattractive signallers from sexual selection

For many animals, options abound when choosing a mate in socially complex environments like a breeding chorus or lek. In such environments, receivers often choose their mate based on individual differences in signal repetition rate. However, signallers also differ in the regularity with which they produce repeated signals. Irregularity in signalling introduces uncertainty in decision-making by masking the among-individual variation in signalling rate that is a target of mate choice. At present, we know little about how the complexity of the choice environment affects selection on rate and regularity, two signalling behaviours that receivers can only compare after sampling series of signals produced by multiple signallers. In this study of female grey treefrogs (<i>Hyla chrysoscelis</i>), we measured multivariate sexual selection on the rate and regularity of male calling behaviour using two-, four- and eight-choice tests. Receivers overwhelmingly chose faster, more regular calling rates in two-choice tests, but did so markedly less often when they chose among four or eight stimuli. Sexual selection imposed by female choice became markedly weaker and differently shaped as the complexity of the social environment increased, suggesting noise and choice overload effects may allow relatively unattractive males to mate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.0585
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complex choice environments shelter unattractive signallers from sexual selection

Mark A. Bee, Jessie C. Tanner, Mark Shein‐Idelson, Kim L. Hoke
1 citations
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
3.03
article

Complex choice environments shelter unattractive signallers from sexual selection

Mark A. Bee, Jessie C. Tanner, Mark Shein‐Idelson, Kim L. Hoke
article en
1 citations

Abstract

For many animals, options abound when choosing a mate in socially complex environments like a breeding chorus or lek. In such environments, receivers often choose their mate based on individual differences in signal repetition rate. However, signallers also differ in the regularity with which they produce repeated signals. Irregularity in signalling introduces uncertainty in decision-making by masking the among-individual variation in signalling rate that is a target of mate choice. At present, we know little about how the complexity of the choice environment affects selection on rate and regularity, two signalling behaviours that receivers can only compare after sampling series of signals produced by multiple signallers. In this study of female grey treefrogs (<i>Hyla chrysoscelis</i>), we measured multivariate sexual selection on the rate and regularity of male calling behaviour using two-, four- and eight-choice tests. Receivers overwhelmingly chose faster, more regular calling rates in two-choice tests, but did so markedly less often when they chose among four or eight stimuli. Sexual selection imposed by female choice became markedly weaker and differently shaped as the complexity of the social environment increased, suggesting noise and choice overload effects may allow relatively unattractive males to mate.

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 292(2054)
U.S. National Science Foundation (US), Tel Aviv University (IL), Knoxville College (US), Twin Cities Orthopedics (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), Colorado State University (US)
National Science Foundation, United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
3.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.