Isavuconazole Therapy for Patients with Hematologic Diseases and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with and Without Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Infections

There are no data available on the effectiveness and safety of isavuconazole (ISA) for treating breakthrough invasive fungal infections (bIFIs). A retrospective and prospective cohort study was conducted between January 2020 and March 2025 in 13 centers in Argentina. Hematologic diseases (HD) and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) patients who received ISA for IFI were included and followed for 12 weeks. Patients with proven and probable bIFIs and non-bIFIs were compared. One hundred and sixty-three patients were included. IFIs were classified as proven (13.5%), probable (26.9%) and possible (59.5%). Among 66 proven and probable IFIs, 53% were bIFIs, with aspergillosis and mucormycosis being the most common. Twenty-three (34.8%) patients had acute myelogenous leukemia, and 40.9% had received HCT. Forty-eight (72.7%) patients experienced neutropenia, with a median duration of 26 days (interquartile range [IQR] 16-44). Fluconazole and posaconazole were the most frequently received antifungal prophylaxis. ISA was prescribed as first-line therapy in 31 (46.9%) patients. The other 35 received ISA as a continuation therapy, mainly as a step-down therapy after liposomal amphotericin B. Four (6.1%) patients developed adverse effects, and one discontinued ISA. The 90-day overall clinical response between patients with bIFI vs. non-bIFI was 91.4% vs. 70.9% (<i>p</i> = 0.052). The 90-day overall and IFI-related mortality rates were, respectively, 11.4% vs. 32.3% (<i>p</i> = 0.068) and 5.7% vs. 9.7% (<i>p</i> = 0.659). The study data evidence ISA effectiveness and safety for the treatment of HD and HCT patients with and without bIFIs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fungi
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11090648
Primary Topic
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Isavuconazole Therapy for Patients with Hematologic Diseases and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with and Without Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Infections

Javier Afeltra, Maximiliano Gabriel Castro, Gustavo‐Adolfo Méndez, Agustina Risso Patrón et al.
Journal of Fungi
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
article

Isavuconazole Therapy for Patients with Hematologic Diseases and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with and Without Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Infections

Javier Afeltra, Maximiliano Gabriel Castro, Gustavo‐Adolfo Méndez, Agustina Risso Patrón, Sergio Rojas, Manuel Alderete, Rosana Jordán, Adriana Manzur, Noelia Mañez, Hugo Peretti, Rocío Gago, Claudia Salgueira, Diego Torres, Natalia Allende, Juan Ignacio Dapás, Myrna Cabral, Fabián Herrera, José Benso, Carla Niveyro, Verónica Fernández, M.L. González Pereyra, Federico Pollastrelli
article en

Abstract

There are no data available on the effectiveness and safety of isavuconazole (ISA) for treating breakthrough invasive fungal infections (bIFIs). A retrospective and prospective cohort study was conducted between January 2020 and March 2025 in 13 centers in Argentina. Hematologic diseases (HD) and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) patients who received ISA for IFI were included and followed for 12 weeks. Patients with proven and probable bIFIs and non-bIFIs were compared. One hundred and sixty-three patients were included. IFIs were classified as proven (13.5%), probable (26.9%) and possible (59.5%). Among 66 proven and probable IFIs, 53% were bIFIs, with aspergillosis and mucormycosis being the most common. Twenty-three (34.8%) patients had acute myelogenous leukemia, and 40.9% had received HCT. Forty-eight (72.7%) patients experienced neutropenia, with a median duration of 26 days (interquartile range [IQR] 16-44). Fluconazole and posaconazole were the most frequently received antifungal prophylaxis. ISA was prescribed as first-line therapy in 31 (46.9%) patients. The other 35 received ISA as a continuation therapy, mainly as a step-down therapy after liposomal amphotericin B. Four (6.1%) patients developed adverse effects, and one discontinued ISA. The 90-day overall clinical response between patients with bIFI vs. non-bIFI was 91.4% vs. 70.9% (<i>p</i> = 0.052). The 90-day overall and IFI-related mortality rates were, respectively, 11.4% vs. 32.3% (<i>p</i> = 0.068) and 5.7% vs. 9.7% (<i>p</i> = 0.659). The study data evidence ISA effectiveness and safety for the treatment of HD and HCT patients with and without bIFIs.

Journal of FungiVol. 11(9)
University of Mendoza (AR), Hospital Británico (UY), National University of Misiones (AR), Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (AR), Centro Científico Tecnológico - San Juan (AR), Hospital Universitario Austral (AR), Hospital Ramos Mejía (AR), Instituto Alexander Fleming (AR), Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas Norberto Quirno (AR), Hospital Alemán (AR), Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires (AR), Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.