The structure of quark mass corrections in the gg → HH amplitude at high-energy
A bstract The leading and next-to-leading order QCD predictions for Higgs boson pair production at hadron colliders suffer from a significant mass renormalisation scheme uncertainty related to the choice of the top-quark mass. The functional dependence of the result on the value of the intermediate quark mass can be understood in the high-energy limit using the Method of Regions and the tools of Soft-Collinear Effective Theory. In this work, we study the origin of the sizeable logarithmic mass corrections in the gg → HH amplitudes at leading and next-to-leading power in the limit s , | t |, | u | ≫ $$ {m}_t^2 $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mi>t</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> ≫ $$ {m}_H^2 $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>m</mml:mi> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> . We argue that the mass corrections follow a predictable factorised pattern that can be exploited to simplify their computation. We present results for the leading power leading logarithmic corrections, our analysis leads to a significant reduction in the theoretical uncertainty of the double Higgs production amplitudes at scattering energies ≳ 1 TeV due to the top-quark mass scheme.
Authors
- Stephen Jones (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0024-7970)
- Robert Szafron (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9640-6923)
- Sebastian Jaskiewicz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3693-0993)
- Yannick Ulrich (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9947-3064)
Institutions
- University of Bern (CH)
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Durham University (GB)
- Brookhaven National Laboratory (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2025-09-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep09(2025)015
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 9.35
Funders
- Strong