Numerical study on a novel method for the plasma vertical position control using non-axisymmetric coils in JT-60SA

Abstract A numerical investigation explored the feasibility of controlling the plasma vertical position using non-axisymmetric coils in JT-60SA. Non-axisymmetric coils offer an alternative to conventional axisymmetric in-vessel coils, addressing challenges in installation and maintenance, particularly in the context of the Japanese DEMO reactor. However, the main concern with using non-axisymmetric coils is the potential generation of locked modes, and the consumption of control margins for other control actions such as edge localized mode suppression. To address such challenges,, we developed control logic to maximize accessible elongation while simultaneously minimizing coil currents. To assess controllability, we employed a magnetohydrodynamic equilibrium control simulator (MECS) and used vacuum magnetic field analysis. We demonstrated that with the application of non-axisymmetric coils, the plasma elongation was extended from 1.75 which was achieved with superconducting poloidal field (SCPF) coils to 1.95, even in the presence of a minor I p disruption. We also found that an error field correction coil (EFCC) could control during full discharge from ramp-up to ramp-down. The impact of non-axisymmetric magnetic fields on locked modes was evaluated using a three-mode error index ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>TMEI</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ), revealing that n = 1 perturbations remained within acceptable limits ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>TMEI</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mtext>⩽</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>mT</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) in most scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ae0208
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical study on a novel method for the plasma vertical position control using non-axisymmetric coils in JT-60SA

H. Urano, Shizuo Inoue, S. Kojima, Yongtae KO et al.
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Numerical study on a novel method for the plasma vertical position control using non-axisymmetric coils in JT-60SA

H. Urano, Shizuo Inoue, S. Kojima, Yongtae KO, T. Suzuki, N. Aiba, Yoshiaki Miyata
article en

Abstract

Abstract A numerical investigation explored the feasibility of controlling the plasma vertical position using non-axisymmetric coils in JT-60SA. Non-axisymmetric coils offer an alternative to conventional axisymmetric in-vessel coils, addressing challenges in installation and maintenance, particularly in the context of the Japanese DEMO reactor. However, the main concern with using non-axisymmetric coils is the potential generation of locked modes, and the consumption of control margins for other control actions such as edge localized mode suppression. To address such challenges,, we developed control logic to maximize accessible elongation while simultaneously minimizing coil currents. To assess controllability, we employed a magnetohydrodynamic equilibrium control simulator (MECS) and used vacuum magnetic field analysis. We demonstrated that with the application of non-axisymmetric coils, the plasma elongation was extended from 1.75 which was achieved with superconducting poloidal field (SCPF) coils to 1.95, even in the presence of a minor I p disruption. We also found that an error field correction coil (EFCC) could control during full discharge from ramp-up to ramp-down. The impact of non-axisymmetric magnetic fields on locked modes was evaluated using a three-mode error index ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>TMEI</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ), revealing that n = 1 perturbations remained within acceptable limits ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>TMEI</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mtext>⩽</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"/> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>mT</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) in most scenarios.

Plasma Physics and Controlled FusionVol. 67(9)
National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (JP), Advanced Science Research Center (JP), Ibaraki University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.