Allograft Prosthetic Composites in Complex Primary and Revision Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty

Substantial bone loss at the time of complex primary and revision shoulder or elbow arthroplasty is challenging. Large bone defects compromise component support and important muscle-tendon units. Megaprosthesis, osteoarticular allografts, vascularized bone transfers, fusions, and allograft prosthetic composites (APCs) have all been described for reconstruction in these difficult situations. APCs increase bone stock and provide a better opportunity for soft-tissue reconstruction; however, they are prone to other complications, including graft resorption, nonunion, and fracture. This article provides a comprehensive understanding and review of the benefits and disadvantages of APC utilization in shoulder and elbow arthroplasty. Technical considerations are discussed to maximize functional outcomes. Moreover, advances in templating and three-dimensional printing offer a promising future for planning, precise preparation, and surgical efficiency of APC use in upper extremity arthroplasty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-24-01475
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Allograft Prosthetic Composites in Complex Primary and Revision Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty

Matthew T. Houdek, Jacob J. Triplet, Adnan N. Cheema, Mark E. Morrey et al.
1 citations
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
2.01
article

Allograft Prosthetic Composites in Complex Primary and Revision Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty

Matthew T. Houdek, Jacob J. Triplet, Adnan N. Cheema, Mark E. Morrey, Joaquín Sánchez‐Sotelo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Substantial bone loss at the time of complex primary and revision shoulder or elbow arthroplasty is challenging. Large bone defects compromise component support and important muscle-tendon units. Megaprosthesis, osteoarticular allografts, vascularized bone transfers, fusions, and allograft prosthetic composites (APCs) have all been described for reconstruction in these difficult situations. APCs increase bone stock and provide a better opportunity for soft-tissue reconstruction; however, they are prone to other complications, including graft resorption, nonunion, and fracture. This article provides a comprehensive understanding and review of the benefits and disadvantages of APC utilization in shoulder and elbow arthroplasty. Technical considerations are discussed to maximize functional outcomes. Moreover, advances in templating and three-dimensional printing offer a promising future for planning, precise preparation, and surgical efficiency of APC use in upper extremity arthroplasty.

Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsVol. 33(20)
Mayo Clinic (US), Centre Alpien de Phytogéographie (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Allograft Prosthetic Composites in Complex Primary and Revision Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty — Matthew T. Houdek, Jacob J. Triplet, et al. · Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS