INEQUITABLE ACCESS TO SUSTAINABILITY CERTIFICATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EUROPEAN GREENWASHING LEGISLATION

This study examines potential unintended consequences of the EU Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition Directive (approved) and the Green Claims Directive (stalled) on the hotel sector, revealing that sustainability certification is concentrated among large, high-end, chain-affiliated hotels. Small and independent hotels face significant structural barriers—such as high costs, limited resources, and lack of support—that risk excluding them from making environmental claims. Without targeted policy interventions, both directives could entrench inequities and marginalise under-resourced businesses. Using real options theory, the report identifies four strategic responses: wait and see, partial investment, growth, and withdrawal. It calls for inclusive policy design, accessible certification systems, and coordinated stakeholder action to ensure equitable implementation

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/rk53z_v1
Primary Topic
International Environmental Law and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INEQUITABLE ACCESS TO SUSTAINABILITY CERTIFICATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EUROPEAN GREENWASHING LEGISLATION

Xavier Font, Inma Gallego, Juan Pedro Mellinas
International Environmental Law and Policies
article

INEQUITABLE ACCESS TO SUSTAINABILITY CERTIFICATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EUROPEAN GREENWASHING LEGISLATION

Xavier Font, Inma Gallego, Juan Pedro Mellinas
article en

Abstract

This study examines potential unintended consequences of the EU Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition Directive (approved) and the Green Claims Directive (stalled) on the hotel sector, revealing that sustainability certification is concentrated among large, high-end, chain-affiliated hotels. Small and independent hotels face significant structural barriers—such as high costs, limited resources, and lack of support—that risk excluding them from making environmental claims. Without targeted policy interventions, both directives could entrench inequities and marginalise under-resourced businesses. Using real options theory, the report identifies four strategic responses: wait and see, partial investment, growth, and withdrawal. It calls for inclusive policy design, accessible certification systems, and coordinated stakeholder action to ensure equitable implementation

Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
International Environmental Law and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.