IUC24400-75 Real-world outcomes of second-line pembrolizumab in urothelial cancer: Campania network analysis

Abstract Background Platinum-based chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy is standard for locally advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (La/mUC). Despite advances, La/mUC remains aggressive with poor prognosis. Real-world outcomes may differ from clinical trials. Oncology networks generating real-world data (RWD) are crucial to guide treatment. We retrospectively analyzed La/mUC patients treated with second-line pembrolizumab within the Campania Oncological Network (ROC). Methods This multicenter retrospective study included patients (≥18 years) with histologically/cytologically confirmed La/mUC, previously treated with chemotherapy, who received pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) across 6 ROC centers. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Results From January 2021 to November 2023, 132 patients received pembrolizumab. Median age was 67 years (range 30-88); 73.5% were male. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was 0-1 in 82.6%. Most had pure urothelial carcinoma (87.1%), and 12.9% had rare variants. At diagnosis, 34.1% had metastatic disease, and 54.5% underwent cystectomy. Common metastatic sites were lymph nodes (74.2%), lung (38.6%), bone (34.1%), and liver (15.9%). After a median follow-up of 8.5 months, 81.8% experienced progression or death. Median PFS and OS were 3.75 (95% CI, 3.4- 4.7) and 7.3 (95% CI, 6.05-9.33) months, respectively. ORR was 13.5% (95% CI, 7.4%-19.7%), DCR 33.9% (95% CI, 25.6%-42.0%), and ORR in rare subtypes was 23.5% (95% CI, 3.3%-43.7%). Metastatic disease at diagnosis (HR = 2.01, P = .02) and liver metastases (HR = 2.11, P = .02) were associated with worse OS. Lymph node-only metastases predicted better PFS (HR = 0.46, P = .004) and OS (HR = 0.52, P = .02). Prior cystectomy improved PFS (HR = 0.67, P = .04) and OS (HR = 0.54, P = .003) in univariate analysis. Among 114 treatment-related adverse events (AEs), 79.8% were grade 1-2, and 20.2% grade 3-4. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Pembrolizumab was discontinued in 7.6% due to AEs; the most frequent were asthenia (20%), pruritus (10%), and myalgia (7%). Conclusions Second-line pembrolizumab showed clinical activity and acceptable safety in this real-world La/mUC cohort. Prognostic factors such as metastatic sites and prior cystectomy significantly influenced outcomes. These data support the role of oncology networks in guiding real-world treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Oncologist
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf248.022
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IUC24400-75 Real-world outcomes of second-line pembrolizumab in urothelial cancer: Campania network analysis

Francesco Sabbatino, Enzo Perri, Carlo Buonerba, Elio Coppola et al.
The Oncologist
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

IUC24400-75 Real-world outcomes of second-line pembrolizumab in urothelial cancer: Campania network analysis

Francesco Sabbatino, Enzo Perri, Carlo Buonerba, Elio Coppola, Rosa Tambaro, Luigi Formisano, Davide Bosso, Andrea Muto, S. Pignata, Giuseppe Di Lorenzo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Platinum-based chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy is standard for locally advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (La/mUC). Despite advances, La/mUC remains aggressive with poor prognosis. Real-world outcomes may differ from clinical trials. Oncology networks generating real-world data (RWD) are crucial to guide treatment. We retrospectively analyzed La/mUC patients treated with second-line pembrolizumab within the Campania Oncological Network (ROC). Methods This multicenter retrospective study included patients (≥18 years) with histologically/cytologically confirmed La/mUC, previously treated with chemotherapy, who received pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) across 6 ROC centers. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Results From January 2021 to November 2023, 132 patients received pembrolizumab. Median age was 67 years (range 30-88); 73.5% were male. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was 0-1 in 82.6%. Most had pure urothelial carcinoma (87.1%), and 12.9% had rare variants. At diagnosis, 34.1% had metastatic disease, and 54.5% underwent cystectomy. Common metastatic sites were lymph nodes (74.2%), lung (38.6%), bone (34.1%), and liver (15.9%). After a median follow-up of 8.5 months, 81.8% experienced progression or death. Median PFS and OS were 3.75 (95% CI, 3.4- 4.7) and 7.3 (95% CI, 6.05-9.33) months, respectively. ORR was 13.5% (95% CI, 7.4%-19.7%), DCR 33.9% (95% CI, 25.6%-42.0%), and ORR in rare subtypes was 23.5% (95% CI, 3.3%-43.7%). Metastatic disease at diagnosis (HR = 2.01, P = .02) and liver metastases (HR = 2.11, P = .02) were associated with worse OS. Lymph node-only metastases predicted better PFS (HR = 0.46, P = .004) and OS (HR = 0.52, P = .02). Prior cystectomy improved PFS (HR = 0.67, P = .04) and OS (HR = 0.54, P = .003) in univariate analysis. Among 114 treatment-related adverse events (AEs), 79.8% were grade 1-2, and 20.2% grade 3-4. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Pembrolizumab was discontinued in 7.6% due to AEs; the most frequent were asthenia (20%), pruritus (10%), and myalgia (7%). Conclusions Second-line pembrolizumab showed clinical activity and acceptable safety in this real-world La/mUC cohort. Prognostic factors such as metastatic sites and prior cystectomy significantly influenced outcomes. These data support the role of oncology networks in guiding real-world treatment strategies.

The OncologistVol. 30(Supplement_1)
Azienda Ospedaliera S.Giuseppe Moscati (IT), CTO Andrea Alesini (IT), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT), Ospedali Riuniti San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona (IT), Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT), Ospedale D. Cotugno (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.