IUC23262-80 Comparison of clinical outcome and toxicity of prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostate radiotherapy using spacer gel versus prostate cancer patients on radiotherapy without spacer gel

Abstract Background Spacer gels are used in prostate radiotherapy to reduce rectal toxicity by increasing the space between the prostate and rectum. This audit aimed to Assess the clinical outcomes and toxicity levels in prostate cancer patients receiving radical radiotherapy with spacer gel versus without the use of spacer gel. Evaluate rectal and bladder dosimetry, genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, and PSA levels. Align findings with NICE guidance promoting patient safety, quality care, and innovation. Methods A retrospective audit of 29 prostate cancer patients treated between April 5, 2023 and August 7, 2024. Spacer Group: 12 patients received spacer gel during radiotherapy. Non-Spacer Group: 17 patients received standard radiotherapy. Dose: 60 Gy in 20 fractions. Data collected Dose-volume histogram (DVH), GI/GU toxicity (CTCAE scale), and PSA at 52 weeks. DVH parameters: Mean/max rectal dose, % rectal volume receiving 80%, 90%, 95%, 100% of prescribed dose; bladder dose volumes (V40Gy, V48Gy, V60Gy). Toxicity monitored at end of treatment, and at 6, 24, and 52 weeks post-treatment. Results Rectal Dose: Spacer gel reduced high-dose rectal exposure (V95%). Bladder Dose: The Spacer group showed increased bladder dose, requiring clinical correlation. GU Toxicity: Spacer Group: 11/12 had Grade 1 at 6 weeks; all improved to Grade 0-1 by 6 months. Non-Spacer Group: 17/17 had Grade 1; no worsening at 6 months. GI Toxicity: Spacer Group: 3/12 had Grade 1 at 6 weeks; 0% had toxicity at 6 months. Non-Spacer Group: 7/17 had Grade 1-2 at 6 weeks; 2 had persistent Grade 1 at 6 months. PSA Outcome: All patients in spacer group achieved PSA < 2 ng/mL at 52 weeks. Conclusions Spacer gel effectively reduces high-dose rectal exposure and late GI toxicity in prostate radiotherapy without compromising treatment efficacy. No Grade 2+ GI toxicity observed in the spacer group. Supports future use in high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Oncologist
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf248.034
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IUC23262-80 Comparison of clinical outcome and toxicity of prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostate radiotherapy using spacer gel versus prostate cancer patients on radiotherapy without spacer gel

R. Venkitaraman, Muhammad Faisal, N Korisatan
1 links
The Oncologist
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

IUC23262-80 Comparison of clinical outcome and toxicity of prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostate radiotherapy using spacer gel versus prostate cancer patients on radiotherapy without spacer gel

R. Venkitaraman, Muhammad Faisal, N Korisatan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Spacer gels are used in prostate radiotherapy to reduce rectal toxicity by increasing the space between the prostate and rectum. This audit aimed to Assess the clinical outcomes and toxicity levels in prostate cancer patients receiving radical radiotherapy with spacer gel versus without the use of spacer gel. Evaluate rectal and bladder dosimetry, genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, and PSA levels. Align findings with NICE guidance promoting patient safety, quality care, and innovation. Methods A retrospective audit of 29 prostate cancer patients treated between April 5, 2023 and August 7, 2024. Spacer Group: 12 patients received spacer gel during radiotherapy. Non-Spacer Group: 17 patients received standard radiotherapy. Dose: 60 Gy in 20 fractions. Data collected Dose-volume histogram (DVH), GI/GU toxicity (CTCAE scale), and PSA at 52 weeks. DVH parameters: Mean/max rectal dose, % rectal volume receiving 80%, 90%, 95%, 100% of prescribed dose; bladder dose volumes (V40Gy, V48Gy, V60Gy). Toxicity monitored at end of treatment, and at 6, 24, and 52 weeks post-treatment. Results Rectal Dose: Spacer gel reduced high-dose rectal exposure (V95%). Bladder Dose: The Spacer group showed increased bladder dose, requiring clinical correlation. GU Toxicity: Spacer Group: 11/12 had Grade 1 at 6 weeks; all improved to Grade 0-1 by 6 months. Non-Spacer Group: 17/17 had Grade 1; no worsening at 6 months. GI Toxicity: Spacer Group: 3/12 had Grade 1 at 6 weeks; 0% had toxicity at 6 months. Non-Spacer Group: 7/17 had Grade 1-2 at 6 weeks; 2 had persistent Grade 1 at 6 months. PSA Outcome: All patients in spacer group achieved PSA < 2 ng/mL at 52 weeks. Conclusions Spacer gel effectively reduces high-dose rectal exposure and late GI toxicity in prostate radiotherapy without compromising treatment efficacy. No Grade 2+ GI toxicity observed in the spacer group. Supports future use in high-risk prostate cancer patients.

The OncologistVol. 30(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

IUC23262-80 Comparison of clinical outcome and toxicity of prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostate radiotherapy using spacer gel versus prostate cancer patients on radiotherapy without spacer gel — R. Venkitaraman, Muhammad Faisal, et al. · The Oncologist (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS