Towards an informational account of interpersonal coordination

Human sociality is grounded in the dynamic coordination of individuals as they interact with one another. Indeed, interpersonal coordination on various levels—neural, behavioural, physiological, affective, linguistic—are hallmarks of successful social communication and cooperation. However, describing these complex, interdependent dynamics has been limited by current methodological approaches, owing to a restrictive repertoire of tools and the absence of a unified, standardised methodological framework. Here, we identify information theory, the mathematical theory of communication, as a particularly well-suited conceptual framework to address this shortfall, given its appropriate sensitivity to complex dynamics, including potential nonlinearity and higher-order interactions, and its data-driven, model-agnostic foundations. With deep roots in computational, cognitive, and systems neuroscience, the formal introduction of information-theoretic quantities and methods into the study of interpersonal coordination is perhaps overdue. This Perspective advances the case for a unified information-theoretic framework for the field while paving the path for a new generation of empirically testable, theoretically grounded research questions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/x3nvu_v3
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards an informational account of interpersonal coordination

Richard A. I. Bethlehem, Guillaume Dumas, Andrés Canales‐Johnson, Andrea Luppi et al.
Complex Systems and Decision Making
article

Towards an informational account of interpersonal coordination

Richard A. I. Bethlehem, Guillaume Dumas, Andrés Canales‐Johnson, Andrea Luppi, Victoria Leong, Pedro A. M. Mediano, Edoardo Chidichimo
article en

Abstract

Human sociality is grounded in the dynamic coordination of individuals as they interact with one another. Indeed, interpersonal coordination on various levels—neural, behavioural, physiological, affective, linguistic—are hallmarks of successful social communication and cooperation. However, describing these complex, interdependent dynamics has been limited by current methodological approaches, owing to a restrictive repertoire of tools and the absence of a unified, standardised methodological framework. Here, we identify information theory, the mathematical theory of communication, as a particularly well-suited conceptual framework to address this shortfall, given its appropriate sensitivity to complex dynamics, including potential nonlinearity and higher-order interactions, and its data-driven, model-agnostic foundations. With deep roots in computational, cognitive, and systems neuroscience, the formal introduction of information-theoretic quantities and methods into the study of interpersonal coordination is perhaps overdue. This Perspective advances the case for a unified information-theoretic framework for the field while paving the path for a new generation of empirically testable, theoretically grounded research questions.

University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.