IUC24360-80 Second-line therapies of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after first-line immune-combinations (ICI-combos) (Meet-URO 33 study)

Abstract Background The treatment landscape of mRCC has deeply changed with the advent of first-line immuno-combinations but most patients inevitably progress. Unfortunately, no standard second line is established, and the heterogeneity of the first line increases this treatment uncertainty. In this context, large-scale real-world evidence is increasingly needed. Methods The Meet-URO 33 is a multicentric prospective observational study enrolling mRCC patients receiving first-line systemic therapy. A retrospective cohort of patients treated from January 2021 was included. Analysis on the second systemic treatment line was conducted. Results: A total of 1,557 patients were enrolled from 52 centers, 407 (26%) started a second-line therapy, including 325 (80%) who received first-line ICI-combos. According to the ICI-combo type, 36% of patients treated with Pembrolizumab + Axitinib, 32% with Nivolumab + Ipilimumab, 11% with Nivolumab + Cabozantinib and 9% with Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib started a second-line therapy. Among progressed ICI-combos patients, 293 (90%) started TKI (mostly Cabozantinib), 25 (8%) drug combinations (mainly Lenvatinib + Everolimus/Belzutifan) and 7 (2%) experimental ICI. Particularly, among progressed IO-IO patients, 88% received TKI and 5% drug combinations, while among progressed IO-TKI patients 91% received TKI and 8% drug combinations. The multivariable analysis showed that younger and poorer Meet-URO score patients (< 0.05) received more second-line drug combinations than TKI. In addition, second-line Cabozantinib after IO-TKI was associated with a modest and non-significant OS difference compared to after IO-IO (HR 0.78, 95% CI, 0.53-1.15; P = .20). Conclusions The Meet-URO 33 study showed a large-scale real-world evidence of second-line therapies after first-line ICI-combos. The most frequent therapy is Cabozantinib, which showed OS effectiveness regardless of the type of first-line ICI-combos, similarly to other evidence (eg, CaboPoint and CARINA studies). Drug combinations (Lenvatinib + Everolimus/Belzutifan) are rising as emerging therapies, especially in younger and prognostically unfavorable patients. Further survival and response analyses are planned.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Oncologist
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf248.042
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IUC24360-80 Second-line therapies of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after first-line immune-combinations (ICI-combos) (Meet-URO 33 study)

Lucia Bonomi, Davide Bimbatti, Filippo Maria Deppieri, Vincenza Conteduca et al.
The Oncologist
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

IUC24360-80 Second-line therapies of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after first-line immune-combinations (ICI-combos) (Meet-URO 33 study)

Lucia Bonomi, Davide Bimbatti, Filippo Maria Deppieri, Vincenza Conteduca, Silvia Chiellino, Carlo G. M. Messina, Sarah Scagliarini, Brigida Anna Maiorano, Alessia Cavo, Sara Elena Rebuzzi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The treatment landscape of mRCC has deeply changed with the advent of first-line immuno-combinations but most patients inevitably progress. Unfortunately, no standard second line is established, and the heterogeneity of the first line increases this treatment uncertainty. In this context, large-scale real-world evidence is increasingly needed. Methods The Meet-URO 33 is a multicentric prospective observational study enrolling mRCC patients receiving first-line systemic therapy. A retrospective cohort of patients treated from January 2021 was included. Analysis on the second systemic treatment line was conducted. Results: A total of 1,557 patients were enrolled from 52 centers, 407 (26%) started a second-line therapy, including 325 (80%) who received first-line ICI-combos. According to the ICI-combo type, 36% of patients treated with Pembrolizumab + Axitinib, 32% with Nivolumab + Ipilimumab, 11% with Nivolumab + Cabozantinib and 9% with Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib started a second-line therapy. Among progressed ICI-combos patients, 293 (90%) started TKI (mostly Cabozantinib), 25 (8%) drug combinations (mainly Lenvatinib + Everolimus/Belzutifan) and 7 (2%) experimental ICI. Particularly, among progressed IO-IO patients, 88% received TKI and 5% drug combinations, while among progressed IO-TKI patients 91% received TKI and 8% drug combinations. The multivariable analysis showed that younger and poorer Meet-URO score patients (< 0.05) received more second-line drug combinations than TKI. In addition, second-line Cabozantinib after IO-TKI was associated with a modest and non-significant OS difference compared to after IO-IO (HR 0.78, 95% CI, 0.53-1.15; P = .20). Conclusions The Meet-URO 33 study showed a large-scale real-world evidence of second-line therapies after first-line ICI-combos. The most frequent therapy is Cabozantinib, which showed OS effectiveness regardless of the type of first-line ICI-combos, similarly to other evidence (eg, CaboPoint and CARINA studies). Drug combinations (Lenvatinib + Everolimus/Belzutifan) are rising as emerging therapies, especially in younger and prognostically unfavorable patients. Further survival and response analyses are planned.

The OncologistVol. 30(Supplement_1)
University of Foggia (IT), University of Makeni (SL), Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia (IT), Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII (IT), Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT), Medical Education Institute (US), Ospedale dell' Angelo (IT), Azienda di Rilievo Nazionale ed Alta Specializzazione (IT), Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Villa Torri Hospital (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.