Experience-driven Predictability Does Not Influence Neural Entrainment to the Beat

Humans spontaneously synchronize movements to a perceived underlying pulse, or beat, in music. Beat perception may be indexed by the synchronization of neural oscillations to the beat, marked by increases in EEG amplitude at the beat frequency [Nozaradan, S., Peretz, I., Missal, M., & Mouraux, A. Tagging the neuronal entrainment to beat and meter. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 10234-10240, 2011]. Indeed, neural synchronization to the beat appears stronger for strong-beat than non-beat rhythms [Tal, I., Large, E. W., Rabinovitch, E., Wei, Y., Schroeder, C. E., Poeppel, D., et al. Neural entrainment to the beat: The "missing-pulse" phenomenon. Journal of Neuroscience, 37, 6331-6341, 2017] and may underlie the generation of an internal representation of beat. However, because we are exposed disproportionately to strong-beat rhythms (e.g., most Western music) in the environment, comparisons of neural responses to strong-beat and non-beat rhythms may be confounded by relative differences in familiarity. Here, we dissociated beat-related and familiarity-related neural responses by comparing EEG amplitudes during the perception of strong-beat and non-beat rhythms that were either novel or made familiar through training. First, we recorded EEG from participants while they listened to a set of strong-beat, weak-beat, and non-beat rhythms. Then, they were trained on half of the rhythms over four behavioral sessions by listening to and tapping along with them, such that half of the rhythms were familiar by the end of training. Finally, EEG responses to the full rhythm set (half now familiar, half still unfamiliar) were recorded posttraining. Results show no effect of training on EEG amplitude at beat or stimulus-related frequencies and little evidence of familiarity-driven changes in EEG amplitude for weak- and non-beat rhythms. This suggests that oscillatory entrainment to the beat is not driven by familiarity and therefore likely reflects beat processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.a.95
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experience-driven Predictability Does Not Influence Neural Entrainment to the Beat

Molly J. Henry, Joshua D. Hoddinott, Jessica A. Grahn
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Neuroscience and Music Perception
article

Experience-driven Predictability Does Not Influence Neural Entrainment to the Beat

Molly J. Henry, Joshua D. Hoddinott, Jessica A. Grahn
article en

Abstract

Humans spontaneously synchronize movements to a perceived underlying pulse, or beat, in music. Beat perception may be indexed by the synchronization of neural oscillations to the beat, marked by increases in EEG amplitude at the beat frequency [Nozaradan, S., Peretz, I., Missal, M., & Mouraux, A. Tagging the neuronal entrainment to beat and meter. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 10234-10240, 2011]. Indeed, neural synchronization to the beat appears stronger for strong-beat than non-beat rhythms [Tal, I., Large, E. W., Rabinovitch, E., Wei, Y., Schroeder, C. E., Poeppel, D., et al. Neural entrainment to the beat: The "missing-pulse" phenomenon. Journal of Neuroscience, 37, 6331-6341, 2017] and may underlie the generation of an internal representation of beat. However, because we are exposed disproportionately to strong-beat rhythms (e.g., most Western music) in the environment, comparisons of neural responses to strong-beat and non-beat rhythms may be confounded by relative differences in familiarity. Here, we dissociated beat-related and familiarity-related neural responses by comparing EEG amplitudes during the perception of strong-beat and non-beat rhythms that were either novel or made familiar through training. First, we recorded EEG from participants while they listened to a set of strong-beat, weak-beat, and non-beat rhythms. Then, they were trained on half of the rhythms over four behavioral sessions by listening to and tapping along with them, such that half of the rhythms were familiar by the end of training. Finally, EEG responses to the full rhythm set (half now familiar, half still unfamiliar) were recorded posttraining. Results show no effect of training on EEG amplitude at beat or stimulus-related frequencies and little evidence of familiarity-driven changes in EEG amplitude for weak- and non-beat rhythms. This suggests that oscillatory entrainment to the beat is not driven by familiarity and therefore likely reflects beat processing.

Journal of Cognitive NeuroscienceVol. 38(2)
Western University (CA), Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Neuroscience and Music Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.