Asymmetrical Performance between English-to-Chinese and Chinese-to-English Translation on Asymmetrical Word Order NP + AdjP/AdvP Constructions among Chinese Learners of English: An Outcome of Underutilization of Syntactic Trial and Error Parsing

This study conducts an empirical experiment with 140 subjects and employs statistical analysis using SPSS, GraphPad Prism, and Cursor, confirming four findings: 1. Chinese learners of English show no significant difference in performance when translating symmetrical word order NP + AdjP/AdvP constructions from English to Chinese compared to from Chinese to English. 2. In contrast, their performance on asymmetrical word order NP + AdjP/AdvP constructions is significantly better when translating from English to Chinese than from Chinese to English. 3. The adoption of chunk strategy does not mitigate this asymmetrical translation performance. 4. However, from a confidence perspective, they demonstrate significantly higher confidence in translating both asymmetrical and symmetrical word order NP + AdjP/AdvP constructions from English to Chinese compared to Chinese to English. A model explaining this asymmetrical performance is described, identifying the underutilization of syntactic trial and error parsing among Chinese learners of English as a contributing factor.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/253gm_v1
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Asymmetrical Performance between English-to-Chinese and Chinese-to-English Translation on Asymmetrical Word Order NP + AdjP/AdvP Constructions among Chinese Learners of English: An Outcome of Underutilization of Syntactic Trial and Error Parsing

Jiapeng Xu
1 links
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Asymmetrical Performance between English-to-Chinese and Chinese-to-English Translation on Asymmetrical Word Order NP + AdjP/AdvP Constructions among Chinese Learners of English: An Outcome of Underutilization of Syntactic Trial and Error Parsing

Jiapeng Xu
article en

Abstract

This study conducts an empirical experiment with 140 subjects and employs statistical analysis using SPSS, GraphPad Prism, and Cursor, confirming four findings: 1. Chinese learners of English show no significant difference in performance when translating symmetrical word order NP + AdjP/AdvP constructions from English to Chinese compared to from Chinese to English. 2. In contrast, their performance on asymmetrical word order NP + AdjP/AdvP constructions is significantly better when translating from English to Chinese than from Chinese to English. 3. The adoption of chunk strategy does not mitigate this asymmetrical translation performance. 4. However, from a confidence perspective, they demonstrate significantly higher confidence in translating both asymmetrical and symmetrical word order NP + AdjP/AdvP constructions from English to Chinese compared to Chinese to English. A model explaining this asymmetrical performance is described, identifying the underutilization of syntactic trial and error parsing among Chinese learners of English as a contributing factor.

Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Asymmetrical Performance between English-to-Chinese and Chinese-to-English Translation on Asymmetrical Word Order NP + AdjP/AdvP Constructions among Chinese Learners of English: An Outcome of Underutilization of Syntactic Trial and Error Parsing — Jiapeng Xu · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS