Crafting a Biology Course for Nonmajors: Personas Help Delineate Faculty Decision Making

Science courses are required for nonmajor students as part of general education with the goal of students connecting scientific knowledge to their own lives using science to make decisions. Often, however, these science courses emphasize basic concepts and terms without making it relevant to students' lives. Thus, these courses may not be successful in promoting decision making related to science and society. In this study, we interviewed 35 faculty teaching nonmajors biology to understand their rationale in making course decisions. Through interviews, we learned what factors influence faculty decision-making processes in structuring nonmajors' biology courses, as well as <i>if</i> and <i>how</i> they prioritize teaching about socioscientific issues (SSIs) and scientific competencies. Using cluster analysis, we developed fictional faculty teaching personas based on key themes and characteristics of faculty who prioritize teaching about SSIs versus those who focus on content coverage. These teaching personas could prove useful for professional development planning when seeking to improve student learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-06-0173
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crafting a Biology Course for Nonmajors: Personas Help Delineate Faculty Decision Making

Austin Heil, Cara Gormally, Sandip Kumar Lahiri, Peggy Brickman et al.
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Biomedical and Engineering Education
article

Crafting a Biology Course for Nonmajors: Personas Help Delineate Faculty Decision Making

Austin Heil, Cara Gormally, Sandip Kumar Lahiri, Peggy Brickman, Alex Daniels
article en

Abstract

Science courses are required for nonmajor students as part of general education with the goal of students connecting scientific knowledge to their own lives using science to make decisions. Often, however, these science courses emphasize basic concepts and terms without making it relevant to students' lives. Thus, these courses may not be successful in promoting decision making related to science and society. In this study, we interviewed 35 faculty teaching nonmajors biology to understand their rationale in making course decisions. Through interviews, we learned what factors influence faculty decision-making processes in structuring nonmajors' biology courses, as well as <i>if</i> and <i>how</i> they prioritize teaching about socioscientific issues (SSIs) and scientific competencies. Using cluster analysis, we developed fictional faculty teaching personas based on key themes and characteristics of faculty who prioritize teaching about SSIs versus those who focus on content coverage. These teaching personas could prove useful for professional development planning when seeking to improve student learning.

CBE—Life Sciences EducationVol. 24(3)
Georgia Department of Education (US), University of Georgia (US), Missouri University of Science and Technology (US), Gallaudet University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.