Optimization of U-Net Network and Attention Mechanism in Football Robot Image Segmentation

This paper addresses the semantic segmentation issues of the traditional U-Net in complex scenes, systematically studying the impact of various backbone networks and optimizers on segmentation accuracy. Experiments utilized ResNet50, MobileNetV2, and EfficientNet-B0 as backbone networks, comparing their loss and accuracy during training and validation. The results indicate that ResNet50 performed best in validation accuracy. Additionally, a comparison of the Adam, AdamW, and NAdam optimizers revealed that Adam had the fastest convergence rate, NAdam achieved the highest validation accuracy, and AdamW resulted in the lowest validation loss. Furthermore, by incorporating the Criss-Cross Attention (CCA) module in the bottleneck layer, the model's validation accuracy was enhanced to 0.9680. Ultimately, the model based on ResNet50-U-Net incorporating the CCA attention module and Adam optimizer achieved high-precision segmentation results on the test set.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/raiie65740.2025.11139862
Primary Topic
E-commerce and Technology Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of U-Net Network and Attention Mechanism in Football Robot Image Segmentation

Tianyi Xu
E-commerce and Technology Innovations
article

Optimization of U-Net Network and Attention Mechanism in Football Robot Image Segmentation

Tianyi Xu
article en

Abstract

This paper addresses the semantic segmentation issues of the traditional U-Net in complex scenes, systematically studying the impact of various backbone networks and optimizers on segmentation accuracy. Experiments utilized ResNet50, MobileNetV2, and EfficientNet-B0 as backbone networks, comparing their loss and accuracy during training and validation. The results indicate that ResNet50 performed best in validation accuracy. Additionally, a comparison of the Adam, AdamW, and NAdam optimizers revealed that Adam had the fastest convergence rate, NAdam achieved the highest validation accuracy, and AdamW resulted in the lowest validation loss. Furthermore, by incorporating the Criss-Cross Attention (CCA) module in the bottleneck layer, the model's validation accuracy was enhanced to 0.9680. Ultimately, the model based on ResNet50-U-Net incorporating the CCA attention module and Adam optimizer achieved high-precision segmentation results on the test set.

Beijing Information Science & Technology University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
E-commerce and Technology Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.