Tort Rules and Regulatory Sandboxes: The Influence of the National Jurisdictions

In the legal framework governing regulatory sandboxes, the AI Act devotes only a single paragraph to non-contractual liability, stating that European and national rules apply to providers. However, this choice opens potential scenarios for diverging applications by national courts on the liability of the conducts within the sandbox, which should be considered in light of the different legal models of the single Member States, and which could jeopardize the harmonization process. Furthermore, considering the applicable regulations, consideration should also be given to the proposal to amend the Product Liability Directive, which includes AI systems within its scope. This proposal leans toward a strict liability model or a framework where, through the reversal of the burden of proof, fault plays a limited role, as seen in the proposed AI Liability Directive. The present paper suggests that, in the case of regulatory sandboxes, fault-based liability should apply during the experimental phase in order to not to discourage a developing market and to allow newcos without significant financial investments to access the experimental phase.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/mipro65660.2025.11131991
Primary Topic
Legal principles and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tort Rules and Regulatory Sandboxes: The Influence of the National Jurisdictions

Giovanni Riccio
Legal principles and applications
article

Tort Rules and Regulatory Sandboxes: The Influence of the National Jurisdictions

Giovanni Riccio
article en

Abstract

In the legal framework governing regulatory sandboxes, the AI Act devotes only a single paragraph to non-contractual liability, stating that European and national rules apply to providers. However, this choice opens potential scenarios for diverging applications by national courts on the liability of the conducts within the sandbox, which should be considered in light of the different legal models of the single Member States, and which could jeopardize the harmonization process. Furthermore, considering the applicable regulations, consideration should also be given to the proposal to amend the Product Liability Directive, which includes AI systems within its scope. This proposal leans toward a strict liability model or a framework where, through the reversal of the burden of proof, fault plays a limited role, as seen in the proposed AI Liability Directive. The present paper suggests that, in the case of regulatory sandboxes, fault-based liability should apply during the experimental phase in order to not to discourage a developing market and to allow newcos without significant financial investments to access the experimental phase.

University of Salerno (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Legal principles and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tort Rules and Regulatory Sandboxes: The Influence of the National Jurisdictions — Giovanni Riccio · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS