Development of Responsible Attitudes Towards Ai-Generated Results Among Future Computer Science Teachers

AI-powered platforms have become ubiquitous, and their use, particularly in educational institutions, has emerged as a significant issue. Students often turn to ChatGPT for solutions and then submit the generated responses as their own work. This has brought academic integrity into sharp focus. Another dimension of the problem is that students often lack the ability to formulate effective prompts and to critically evaluate the output. The authors conducted a survey on the use of language models by students. The results revealed a contradiction: while AI platforms are a product of progress and widely used across various domains, many instructors prohibit their use by students. The core issue lies in the way students interact with AI-generated content: they do not verify its accuracy or evaluate it critically. As a response, the authors introduced a selective course. This course taught students how to formulate queries correctly, how to evaluate information, verify its reliability, and assess sources. Education must respond swiftly to societal and technological changes and prepare students for real life. Therefore, it is reasonable to teach students how to use AI-generated content appropriately and transparently. It is also important to understand that information produced by AI is not always accurate. As such, a course that covers the regulatory framework and step-bystep guidance on working with AI tools is highly relevant and can be implemented in universities. An experimental study was conducted before and after the course was introduced. Students who completed the course improved their performance: the percentage of students with a high level of proficiency increased to 36 %. They began verifying sources, correcting AI-generated content, and engaging in critical thinking. This paper presents the course content, the results of the experimental study, and outlines directions for further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/mipro65660.2025.11131748
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of Responsible Attitudes Towards Ai-Generated Results Among Future Computer Science Teachers

O. Zhmud, V. Hryhorenko, Oleksandr Viunenko, Ігор Лантух et al.
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Development of Responsible Attitudes Towards Ai-Generated Results Among Future Computer Science Teachers

O. Zhmud, V. Hryhorenko, Oleksandr Viunenko, Ігор Лантух, N. Dehtiarova, O. Didkivskyi
article en

Abstract

AI-powered platforms have become ubiquitous, and their use, particularly in educational institutions, has emerged as a significant issue. Students often turn to ChatGPT for solutions and then submit the generated responses as their own work. This has brought academic integrity into sharp focus. Another dimension of the problem is that students often lack the ability to formulate effective prompts and to critically evaluate the output. The authors conducted a survey on the use of language models by students. The results revealed a contradiction: while AI platforms are a product of progress and widely used across various domains, many instructors prohibit their use by students. The core issue lies in the way students interact with AI-generated content: they do not verify its accuracy or evaluate it critically. As a response, the authors introduced a selective course. This course taught students how to formulate queries correctly, how to evaluate information, verify its reliability, and assess sources. Education must respond swiftly to societal and technological changes and prepare students for real life. Therefore, it is reasonable to teach students how to use AI-generated content appropriately and transparently. It is also important to understand that information produced by AI is not always accurate. As such, a course that covers the regulatory framework and step-bystep guidance on working with AI tools is highly relevant and can be implemented in universities. An experimental study was conducted before and after the course was introduced. Students who completed the course improved their performance: the percentage of students with a high level of proficiency increased to 36 %. They began verifying sources, correcting AI-generated content, and engaging in critical thinking. This paper presents the course content, the results of the experimental study, and outlines directions for further research.

Sumy National Agrarian University (UA), Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A. S. Makarenko (UA), Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.