Client-Server Architecture for ERP Systems: A Comparative Analysis of Laravel, Django, and ASP.NET Core

This study presents a comparative analysis of three prominent frameworks: Laravel, Django, and ASP.NET Core for developing ERP systems within a client-server architecture. The research underscores how selecting the right framework influences scalability, modularity, and maintainability, which are essential for streamlining organizational workflows and improving decision-making. Laravel is praised for its simplicity and developer-friendly ecosystem, making it suitable for small to medium ERP solutions prioritizing rapid development and cost-efficiency. Django, adhering to its philosophy of “the web framework for perfectionists with deadlines” excels in security, scalability, and handling complex, data-driven applications, fitting for large-scale, high-traffic ERP deployments. Meanwhile, ASP.NET Core, with Microsoft ecosystem integration, offers exceptional performance, scalability, and compatibility with Windows backend services, making it ideal for enterprise-level ERP solutions. The paper evaluates these frameworks through performance benchmarks, case studies, and metrics such as request handling, database support, and scalability mechanisms. Results indicate that no single framework universally outperforms the others. Instead, each addresses distinct project requirements. Aligning the framework choice with business objectives and technical demands empowers organizations to develop flexible, future-ready ERP solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/mipro65660.2025.11132028
Primary Topic
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Client-Server Architecture for ERP Systems: A Comparative Analysis of Laravel, Django, and ASP.NET Core

Azir Aliu, Shkëlqim Miftari
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
article

Client-Server Architecture for ERP Systems: A Comparative Analysis of Laravel, Django, and ASP.NET Core

Azir Aliu, Shkëlqim Miftari
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of three prominent frameworks: Laravel, Django, and ASP.NET Core for developing ERP systems within a client-server architecture. The research underscores how selecting the right framework influences scalability, modularity, and maintainability, which are essential for streamlining organizational workflows and improving decision-making. Laravel is praised for its simplicity and developer-friendly ecosystem, making it suitable for small to medium ERP solutions prioritizing rapid development and cost-efficiency. Django, adhering to its philosophy of “the web framework for perfectionists with deadlines” excels in security, scalability, and handling complex, data-driven applications, fitting for large-scale, high-traffic ERP deployments. Meanwhile, ASP.NET Core, with Microsoft ecosystem integration, offers exceptional performance, scalability, and compatibility with Windows backend services, making it ideal for enterprise-level ERP solutions. The paper evaluates these frameworks through performance benchmarks, case studies, and metrics such as request handling, database support, and scalability mechanisms. Results indicate that no single framework universally outperforms the others. Instead, each addresses distinct project requirements. Aligning the framework choice with business objectives and technical demands empowers organizations to develop flexible, future-ready ERP solutions.

European University (MK), South East European University (MK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cloud Computing and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.