Maize (Zea mays L.) yields and water productivity as affected by cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) intercropping over five consecutive growing seasons in a semi-arid environment in Kenya

Research on maize ( Zea mays L.)–cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp .) intercropping in sub-Saharan drylands, especially involving continuous measurements of soil water dynamics, remains limited. To address this gap, we conducted a field experiment in southeastern Kenya. The study aimed to assess whether intercropping enhances maize yields, quantify cowpea’s contribution to grain and biomass production, and evaluate its potential to improve water productivity for both maize and the overall cropping system. Using a randomized complete block design, we compared maize sole cropping and maize–cowpea intercropping systems by monitoring yield components, canopy height, leaf chlorophyll content, and soil water dynamics and assessing water productivity over five growing seasons (2019–2021). Observed maize yields averaged 2730 kg ha⁻¹ for sole cropping and 2281 kg ha⁻¹ for intercropping. Intercropping did not significantly compromise maize yields but led to reduced maize canopy height. No systematic increase in maize leaf chlorophyll content was observed in the intercrop. Cowpea provided modest benefits to the intercrop, primarily through vegetative mass rather than grain yield. Yields depended more on the timing of rainfall events than on the total rainfall amount. Intercropping did not significantly increase water productivity. Despite significant seasonal differences in observed yields and crop water use, water productivity remained statistically similar across season, indicating losses through evaporation. Our findings suggest that measures aimed at conserving soil moisture or reducing soil water depletion are likely to enhance the benefits of intercropping. • Intercropping added vegetative biomass but had limited grain yield benefits. • Rainfall temporal distribution, not total amount, determined yields. • Intercropping with cowpea did not significantly compromise the maize yield. • Soil water depletion was key to crop yield stability in studied conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109779
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maize (Zea mays L.) yields and water productivity as affected by cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) intercropping over five consecutive growing seasons in a semi-arid environment in Kenya

Juuso Tuure, Laura Alakukku, Pirjo Mäkelä, Petri Pellikka et al.
1 citations
Agricultural Water Management
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
1.90
article

Maize (Zea mays L.) yields and water productivity as affected by cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) intercropping over five consecutive growing seasons in a semi-arid environment in Kenya

Juuso Tuure, Laura Alakukku, Pirjo Mäkelä, Petri Pellikka, Kevin Z. Mganga, Sheila Wachiye, Matti Räsänen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Research on maize ( Zea mays L.)–cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp .) intercropping in sub-Saharan drylands, especially involving continuous measurements of soil water dynamics, remains limited. To address this gap, we conducted a field experiment in southeastern Kenya. The study aimed to assess whether intercropping enhances maize yields, quantify cowpea’s contribution to grain and biomass production, and evaluate its potential to improve water productivity for both maize and the overall cropping system. Using a randomized complete block design, we compared maize sole cropping and maize–cowpea intercropping systems by monitoring yield components, canopy height, leaf chlorophyll content, and soil water dynamics and assessing water productivity over five growing seasons (2019–2021). Observed maize yields averaged 2730 kg ha⁻¹ for sole cropping and 2281 kg ha⁻¹ for intercropping. Intercropping did not significantly compromise maize yields but led to reduced maize canopy height. No systematic increase in maize leaf chlorophyll content was observed in the intercrop. Cowpea provided modest benefits to the intercrop, primarily through vegetative mass rather than grain yield. Yields depended more on the timing of rainfall events than on the total rainfall amount. Intercropping did not significantly increase water productivity. Despite significant seasonal differences in observed yields and crop water use, water productivity remained statistically similar across season, indicating losses through evaporation. Our findings suggest that measures aimed at conserving soil moisture or reducing soil water depletion are likely to enhance the benefits of intercropping. • Intercropping added vegetative biomass but had limited grain yield benefits. • Rainfall temporal distribution, not total amount, determined yields. • Intercropping with cowpea did not significantly compromise the maize yield. • Soil water depletion was key to crop yield stability in studied conditions.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 319
University of Nairobi (KE), University of Helsinki (FI), Utrecht University (NL), Helsinki Institute of Physics (FI), University of Kabianga (KE), Wuhan University (CN), Namibia Institute of Pathology (NA)
Academy of Finland
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
1.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.