Development, validation and use of artificial-intelligence-related technologies to assess basic motor skills in children: a scoping review

<ns7:p>Background In basic motor skills evaluation, two observers can eventually mark the same child’s performance differently. When systematic, this brings serious noise to the assessment. New motion sensing and tracking technologies offer more precise measures of these children’s capabilities. We aimed to review current development, validation and use of artificial intelligence-related technologies that assess basic motor skills in children aged 3 to 6 years old. Methods We performed a scoping review in Medline, EBSCO, IEEE and Web of Science databases. PRISMA Extension recommendations for scoping reviews were applied for the full review, whereas the COSMIN criteria for diagnostic instruments helped to evaluate the validation of the artificial intelligence (AI)-related measurements. Results We found 672 studies, from which 12 were finally selected, 7 related to development and validation and 5 related to use. From the 7 technology development studies, we examined their citation networks using Google Scholar and identified 10 subsequent peer-reviewed publications that either enhanced the original technologies or applied them in new research contexts. Studies on AI-related technologies have prioritized development and technological features. The validation of these algorithms was based on engineering standards, focusing on their accuracy and technical performance, but without integrating medical and psychological knowledge about children’s motor development. They also did not consider the technical characteristics that are typically assessed in psychometric instruments designed to assess motor skills in children (e.g., the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments “COSMIN”). Therefore, the use of these AI-related technologies in scientific research is still limited. Conclusion Clinical measurement standards have not been integrated into the development of AI-related technologies for measuring basic motor skills in children. This compromises the validity, reliability and practical utility of these tools, so future improvement in this type of research is needed.</ns7:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2025-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.138616.2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Children's Physical and Motor Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development, validation and use of artificial-intelligence-related technologies to assess basic motor skills in children: a scoping review

Juan Carlos Bazo‐Alvarez, Oscar Bazo-Alvarez, Heber Gómez Hurtado, Joel Figueroa-Quiñones et al.
1 citations
F1000Research
Children's Physical and Motor Development
3.44
article

Development, validation and use of artificial-intelligence-related technologies to assess basic motor skills in children: a scoping review

Juan Carlos Bazo‐Alvarez, Oscar Bazo-Alvarez, Heber Gómez Hurtado, Joel Figueroa-Quiñones, Juan Ipanaqué-Neyra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<ns7:p>Background In basic motor skills evaluation, two observers can eventually mark the same child’s performance differently. When systematic, this brings serious noise to the assessment. New motion sensing and tracking technologies offer more precise measures of these children’s capabilities. We aimed to review current development, validation and use of artificial intelligence-related technologies that assess basic motor skills in children aged 3 to 6 years old. Methods We performed a scoping review in Medline, EBSCO, IEEE and Web of Science databases. PRISMA Extension recommendations for scoping reviews were applied for the full review, whereas the COSMIN criteria for diagnostic instruments helped to evaluate the validation of the artificial intelligence (AI)-related measurements. Results We found 672 studies, from which 12 were finally selected, 7 related to development and validation and 5 related to use. From the 7 technology development studies, we examined their citation networks using Google Scholar and identified 10 subsequent peer-reviewed publications that either enhanced the original technologies or applied them in new research contexts. Studies on AI-related technologies have prioritized development and technological features. The validation of these algorithms was based on engineering standards, focusing on their accuracy and technical performance, but without integrating medical and psychological knowledge about children’s motor development. They also did not consider the technical characteristics that are typically assessed in psychometric instruments designed to assess motor skills in children (e.g., the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments “COSMIN”). Therefore, the use of these AI-related technologies in scientific research is still limited. Conclusion Clinical measurement standards have not been integrated into the development of AI-related technologies for measuring basic motor skills in children. This compromises the validity, reliability and practical utility of these tools, so future improvement in this type of research is needed.</ns7:p>

F1000ResearchVol. 12
Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista (PE), Universidad César Vallejo (PE), Universidad Tecnológica del Perú (PE), University College London (GB), Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (MX)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Children's Physical and Motor Development
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.