Understanding motivation and experience in participating in a paediatric SARS-CoV-2 serosurvey, in Australia
Serosurveys are considered as a valuable tool in estimating population immunity and infection rates but recruitment of children to provide paediatric estimates can be challenging. A novel approach of sampling children undergoing anaesthesia was utilised for a SARS-CoV-2 serosurvey in Australian children and we explore the reasons for participation, feedback on the approach and importance of research into Coronavirus Diseases 2019 (COVID-19). This cross-sectional, nationally representative serosurvey recruited children aged 0–19 years undergoing an anaesthetic procedure from eight paediatric hospitals between 8 June to 31 August 2022. Guardians or participants (18–19 years) were invited, upon receiving their results, to provide an online survey. A qualitative thematic approach was used to analyse the free-text responses. Feedback was provided by 15.7 % (323/2046) participants. Reasons for participating included contributing to research (67/323 responders) and curiosity about SARS-CoV-2 immunity (65/323 responders). The opportunistic sampling method was well-received, convenient, and minimally disruptive. Responders emphasised the importance of research on COVID-19 in children, highlighting the need to understand the long-term impact of the virus and to inform vaccination decisions. There are challenges in conducting ethical, low-burden cross sectional serosurveys in children in a vast country like Australia. This approach not only contributed to the collection of a large paediatric sample size but also supports the use of this method in future serosurveys. • SARS-Cov-2 serosurveys in children used sera from children undergoing anaesthetic procedures • Opportunistic sampling during anaesthesia was minimally disruptive and effective for future serosurveys. • Participation was driven by research interest, curiosity, and the convenience of collection • Responders were keen on research on long-term effects and to guide vaccination decisions.
Authors
- Nigel W. Crawford (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1851-5080)
- Katarzyna Bolsewicz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6495-6912)
- Peter Richmond (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7562-7228)
- Archana Koirala (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2567-8825)
- Brendan McMullan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5144-3416)
- Eldin A. Leighton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3032-0315)
- Philip N Britton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2993-6000)
- Kristine Macartney (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4675-0232)
- Helen Siobhan Marshall (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2521-5166)
- Nicholas Wood
- S. R. Prasad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2088-8584)
- Michelle Wills
- Laura Francis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9302-4543)
Institutions
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- The Kids Research Institute Australia (AU)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Princess Margaret Hospital for Children (AU)
- Women's and Children's Hospital (AU)
- Nepean Hospital (AU)
- Children's Hospital at Westmead (AU)
- Monash Children’s Hospital (AU)
- Sydney Children's Hospital (AU)
- Royal Darwin Hospital (AU)
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU)
- National Centre for Immunisation Research & Surveillance (AU)
- Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service (AU)
- Perth Children's Hospital
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Vaccine X
- Published
- 2025-09-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100716
- Primary Topic
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00