Развитие российско-персидской торговли по среднеазиатской границе на рубеже XIX–XX вв.

Introduction. The paper examines the history of infrastructure cooperation between the Russian Empire and Persia at the turn of the twentieth century, which included the construction of a cart road between two important economic centers of the Southeastern Caspian — Ashgabat and Mashhad. The project was intended to intensify trade processes between Russia and Persia’s Khorasan through Transcaspian Oblast. Goals. The article seeks to show the role of the Ashgabat–Mashhad road in the shaping of bilateral trade and economic relations in the late imperial era. To facilitate this, the work shall consider the road’s construction progress and features, articulate its impacts on mutual trade turnover within the specified period, reveal roles of financial, organizational, geopolitical factors during the Russian-Persian infrastructure project’s implementation. Materials and methods. The study analyzes quite a variety of sources, including both published and unpublished ones (the latter discovered in federal archives). The study employs the structural historical, comparative and systems methods. Results and conclusions. The Ashgabat – Mashhad road, Transcaspian Railway and other transport routes constituted a unified transport infrastructure system that connected Russia’s Central Asian territories to Northeast Persia. This did contribute to the intensification of mutual trade in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. However, the low quality of construction works on the Persian section, Russia’s lack of efficient construction control tools in the territory of Persia, resistance from Great Britain, and other factors led to delays, additional financial costs and decreased efficiency. These prompted the Russian Government to completely convey the existing route to a Russian concessionaire for the latter to arrange a large-scale modernization of the required transport corridor. Inter alia, the discussion included a possibility of constructing a railway to be funded by Russian subjects. Still, Russia’s participation in World War I deprived the Government of any opportunity to begin implementing the designed project.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ORIENTAL STUDIES
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2025-77-1-25-39
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Развитие российско-персидской торговли по среднеазиатской границе на рубеже XIX–XX вв.

Gadilya G. Kornoukhova, Saken Zh. Toktamysov
1 citations
ORIENTAL STUDIES
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
8.52
article

Развитие российско-персидской торговли по среднеазиатской границе на рубеже XIX–XX вв.

Gadilya G. Kornoukhova, Saken Zh. Toktamysov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction. The paper examines the history of infrastructure cooperation between the Russian Empire and Persia at the turn of the twentieth century, which included the construction of a cart road between two important economic centers of the Southeastern Caspian — Ashgabat and Mashhad. The project was intended to intensify trade processes between Russia and Persia’s Khorasan through Transcaspian Oblast. Goals. The article seeks to show the role of the Ashgabat–Mashhad road in the shaping of bilateral trade and economic relations in the late imperial era. To facilitate this, the work shall consider the road’s construction progress and features, articulate its impacts on mutual trade turnover within the specified period, reveal roles of financial, organizational, geopolitical factors during the Russian-Persian infrastructure project’s implementation. Materials and methods. The study analyzes quite a variety of sources, including both published and unpublished ones (the latter discovered in federal archives). The study employs the structural historical, comparative and systems methods. Results and conclusions. The Ashgabat – Mashhad road, Transcaspian Railway and other transport routes constituted a unified transport infrastructure system that connected Russia’s Central Asian territories to Northeast Persia. This did contribute to the intensification of mutual trade in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. However, the low quality of construction works on the Persian section, Russia’s lack of efficient construction control tools in the territory of Persia, resistance from Great Britain, and other factors led to delays, additional financial costs and decreased efficiency. These prompted the Russian Government to completely convey the existing route to a Russian concessionaire for the latter to arrange a large-scale modernization of the required transport corridor. Inter alia, the discussion included a possibility of constructing a railway to be funded by Russian subjects. Still, Russia’s participation in World War I deprived the Government of any opportunity to begin implementing the designed project.

ORIENTAL STUDIESVol. 18(1)
Weatherford College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.